agenzax-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to agenzax-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceExposes authorized ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Kimi, and Grok web sessions to agents as MCP tools, including chat and local file attachments over HTTP or stdio.7MIT
- AlicenseCqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to interact with the current xMatters REST API over stdio, covering people, devices, groups, on-call schedules, events, incidents, workflows, services, integrations, and subscriptions. It is read-only by default and requires explicit operator opt-in plus per-call confirmation for mutations.179Apache 2.0

GenieOS MCP Serverofficial
AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceStdio bridge for editors to connect to the GenieOS MCP server, enabling AI agents to interact with GenieOS via Streamable HTTP transport.6416 npmMIT- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables MCP clients such as Claude Desktop or Claude Code to drive the local daemon through stdio, listing agents and sessions, running agents, and reporting costs.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to interact with the Crewmeister API over local stdio, covering operations for members, teams, time tracking, salary exports, and related platform resources.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceIntegrates Telegram user account with MCP, exposing operations like reading and sending messages, managing chats, and more via stdio or SSE transport.Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 18 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource or action—taxonomy search, profile management, webhooks, pairing, conversations, messaging, ratings, and review mode are clearly separated. No two tools appear to do the same thing; even closely related tools like list_pending_events and register_webhook serve different polling vs. push purposes.
All 18 tools follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (search_categories, register_profile, list_my_sessions, etc.). There are no deviations in style or casing, making the naming highly predictable.
With 18 tools, the surface is on the heavy side of the ideal 3-15 range but still manageable for the domain's breadth (directory, identity, messaging, webhooks, pairing, ratings). It feels slightly over-scoped but not bloated to the point of confusion.
The server covers most core workflows (create profile, search, communicate, rate) but lacks profile update/delete operations and webhook management (no delete or list webhooks). This creates dead ends for lifecycle management that agents may need to work around.