Skip to main content
Glama
AgenticFinanceGraph

Agentic Finance Graph MCP Server

Related Servers

Alternatives to Agentic Finance Graph MCP Server

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables agents to query a read-only ledger of machine payments, exposing tools for spending totals, purchases with event chains, verdicts, payer passports, and fiscal reporting data.
    7
    MIT

Related Servers

  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Provides protocol-neutral market intelligence for the AI agent economy, with read-only tools to search agents, retrieve details and histories, compare agents, list categories, view category rankings, and access methodology.
    -
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Provides AI agents read-only, keyless access to Aster DEX data, including futures and spot markets, TradFi perpetuals, funding rates, order books, klines, vault deposit flows, and account views through MCP tools.
    13
    59 PyPI
    1
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Provides live, read-only access to Robinhood Chain and Lox Corp data, enabling AI agents to query chain stats, token launches, agent details, and more.
    7 npm
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables AI agents to query a read-only data surface through typed tools, enforcing caller-specific row access, field masking, and withheld-row disclosure so they can retrieve entitled information without writes or silent data leakage.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables MCP-capable AI agents to make pay-per-call Solana data requests (snapshots, risk checks, token reports, health, balances, transactions, trending pairs) with automatic USDC settlement over x402.
    5
    MIT

TDQS

A3.5/5.0

Scored across 25 tools

Disambiguation3/5

Several clusters of tools target near-identical decisions: pay_check, gate_check, payee_facts, agent_pattern, agent_pass and blast_radius all answer variants of 'is it safe to pay this agent/address', and find_agent, agent_record, ranked_agents, payer_set and counterparty_preview all retrieve agent/counterparty data. Descriptions do add distinguishing language (free vs paid pack, per-payment vs per-agent) but an agent could easily pick the wrong one. Boundaries exist but are subtle rather than clean.

Naming Consistency4/5

All names are consistent snake_case with no camelCase or mixed styles. There is mild drift between noun-only names (definition, detections, market_state, agent_record, payee_facts) and verb_noun names (find_agent, pay_check, gate_check, list_metrics, canary_register), but the conventions remain readable and predictable.

Tool Count3/5

25 tools is at the heavy end for the rubric, and the domain is rich enough to justify many of them, but the overlaps above suggest some tools could be consolidated (e.g. payee_facts as a subset of gate_check). Borderline over-scoped rather than clearly well-scoped.

Completeness4/5

The surface is unusually broad: metric discovery/definitions/history, agent lookup and records, ranking, detections, statements with proofs, sum-log verification, payment gating, and canary registration/status. Coverage looks close to complete for the stated domain; only minor gaps or unclear lifecycle edges keep it from a 5.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues