Skip to main content
Glama
AgenticBridge

StyleTrace

by AgenticBridge
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript

Related Servers

Alternatives to StyleTrace

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • PicassoWeb

      blackridder22
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Analyzes and extracts design tokens, assets, and layout from live websites to enable AI clients to faithfully replicate them, with tools for screenshotting, component inspection, and pixel-diff verification.
      14
      8 npm
      MIT

    • web-design-harvester

      ChenYCL
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Converts any rendered web page into a complete, LLM-readable design specification—including block screenshots, distilled computed CSS, design tokens, responsive deltas, and alpha-channel-analyzed assets—so models can accurately reproduce the design.
      MIT

    • Page Design Guide MCP

      chihebnabil
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides comprehensive design principles and best practices to help LLMs generate modern, accessible web pages through guidance on layouts, colors, and typography. It enables users to review design approaches and access expert recommendations for responsive design, component structure, and current industry trends.
      12
      17 npm
      3
      -

    • Posylai MCP

      crmlove
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible agents to analyze a brand website, build a custom email design system, assemble responsive HTML campaigns, QA rendering, and export production-ready email.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one extracts design grammar from references, the other verifies generated output against an extracted style. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tool names follow the same verb_noun pattern in snake_case: 'analyze_website_style' and 'review_generated_style'. The naming is consistent and predictable.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 2 tools, the set is on the thin side. For a server focused on style analysis and review, this minimal set covers the core workflow but feels slightly sparse compared to typical servers.

    Completeness5/5

    The two tools provide a complete lifecycle for the intended domain: analyze a style from references, then review generated output against that style. There are no obvious gaps in the stated workflow.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources