AgentaOS
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to AgentaOS
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for e-commerce operations including product catalog management, cart/checkout, and Stripe integration, with built-in EU AI Act compliance.51 PyPIMIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for MAIB e-commerce payments (Moldova). Supports payments, refunds, recurring billing, one-click payments, and transaction status via OAuth 2.0.813 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenancePayment infrastructure MCP server enabling AI agents to make gasless USDC payments on Base and JIT single-use virtual card checkouts, with zero-trust card handling, merchant checkout hints, and signed receipts.13138 npm1MIT

inflow-mcpofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP Server for agents to onboard, pay, and provision services autonomously with InFlow6MIT- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for DACH accounting automation. Connect AI assistants to sevDesk and Lexoffice — create invoices, manage contacts, handle bookings and vouchers for German-speaking businesses.1540 npm-
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceAccept crypto payments on Algorand, VOI, Hedera & Stellar. Create hosted checkout links, verify on-chain payments, and generate MPP/x402/AP2 challenges from any MCP client. Supports all 16 AlgoVoi networks (USDC + native on mainnet + testnet).112-
TDQS
Scored across 19 tools
Tools are largely distinct, with clear resource-action separation (e.g., audit_request vs audit_show, pay_checkout vs pay_get). Minor potential confusion between agenta_status_get (account/go-live overview) and agenta_verify_status (verification progress), but descriptions differentiate them well.
Consistent agenta_<resource>_<action> snake_case pattern throughout. Minor deviations: some actions are nouns (status, declaration, receipt) rather than verbs, but the pattern remains predictable.
19 tools is slightly above the ideal 3-15 range but reasonable for a full payments and merchant onboarding platform. Each tool appears to serve a distinct function without obvious redundancy.
Core onboarding (audit, verification) and payment workflows (checkout, subscriptions, invoices) are covered. Notable gaps include refund operations, product/customer update or delete, and subscription creation, which may limit agents in some scenarios.