Skip to main content
Glama
AgentAvow

AgentAvow Trust

Official

Related Servers

Alternatives to AgentAvow Trust

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Enables comprehensive security scanning of code repositories to detect secrets, vulnerabilities, dependency issues, and configuration problems. Provides real-time security checks and best practice recommendations to help developers identify and prevent security issues.
    4 npm
    2
    MIT
  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    An AI-powered security agent that utilizes MCP tools and Groq LLMs to analyze Azure infrastructure, audit security groups, and identify storage misconfigurations. It enables users to perform natural language security assessments and ensure compliance with CIS Azure best practices.
    -

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Agent-native "safe to ship?" security gate for AI-generated code. Uses real parsers and inter-rocedural taint analysis (JS/TS, Python, Go) to flag the classes AI coding agents get wrong — secrets, SQL injection, SS, SSRF, path traversal, command injection, weak JWT/CORS — and ranks findings by confidence. Exposes a scan tool over MCP.
    1
    4 npm
    2
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Real security scanners for AI coding agents — SAST (441 rules), secret detection (419+ patterns), dependency CVEs (OSV.dev), MCP/skill vetting, MITRE ATT&CK. Open-source, Rust, free
    7 npm
    Apache 2.0
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Security co-pilot for AI agents. Scans for vulnerabilities like prompt injection, infinite loops, and token bombing in AI Agents, audits MCP servers, verifies AGENTS.md governance, and generates EU AI Act compliance reports.
    10
    226 npm
    3
    Apache 2.0
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    AI agent skill security scanner. Scans URLs and GitHub repos to verify AI agent capabilities, check security gates, and assess reputation. 4 tools: scan_url, scan_github, gate_check, reputation_check.
    16 npm
    5
    MIT

TDQS

A4.5/5.0

Scored across 10 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: registration vs. bootstrap, readiness check vs. trust building, identity lookup vs. verification, and separate tools for security scanning, interaction safety, and badges. No two tools are easily confused.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names use consistent snake_case with a verb_noun pattern (e.g., check_security, lookup_identity, verify_trust). The 'bot_' prefix for three tools is a minor variation but maintains the pattern.

Tool Count5/5

With 10 tools, the server covers the trust domain comprehensively without excess. Each tool serves a clear function, and the count is appropriate for a focused utility server.

Completeness5/5

The tool set covers the full lifecycle of trust: registration (register_agent, bot_bootstrap), readiness tracking (bot_readiness), trust building (bot_quick_trust), verification (verify_trust, check_trust_tier, check_security), interaction safety, identity lookup, and badge generation. No obvious gaps for the stated purpose.

Maintenance

ActivityActive
ResponsivenessUnresponsive