Skip to main content
Glama
AffixIO

Affixio MCP

Official
by AffixIO
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Affixio MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • hive-mcp-sigr

      srotzin
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to sign and verify actions with ML-DSA-65 digital signatures, providing tamper-proof receipts that can be verified offline without any secrets.
      MIT

    • hive-mcp-spire

      srotzin
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides tools to sign and verify post-quantum attestations of AI agent actions (mint, trajectory, coherence) using ML-DSA-65 signatures, with offline verification always free.
      MIT

    • EthersFlow MCP Server

      Ethersflow
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to verify proposed actions through federated adversarial consensus among multiple LLMs, providing Ed25519-signed attestations to prevent hallucinations, unverified counterparties, and compliance risks before execution.
      1
      MIT

    • Trust Gate MCP

      CWNApps
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Post-quantum, tamper-evident receipts for consequential agent actions. Provides tools for auditing, gating decisions, and egress classification with quantum-hardened security.
      7
      Apache 2.0
    • garl by Garl-Protocol

      garlofficial

      Garl-Protocol
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Cryptographic verification for AI agent actions — ECDSA-secp256k1 signed Action Receipts anchored on Base, multi-dimensional trust vectors, capability tokens, and offline-verifiable on-chain proof. 29 tools.
      2
      Apache 2.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct stage in the attestation workflow: gating a tool call, recording an action, and verifying an attestation. There is no ambiguity between them, as the verb and noun clearly separate purposes.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All three tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern: gate_tool_call, attest_action, verify_action. This makes the naming predictable and easy to reason about.

    Tool Count5/5

    With only three tools, the server is tightly scoped to its attestation/gating purpose without unnecessary bloat. Each tool serves a necessary role in the workflow.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set covers the full lifecycle of attestation: gating a call, creating an attestation, and verifying it. No obvious gaps exist for the stated domain.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources