llm-redteam-mcp
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| LLM_REDTEAM_PROBE_DIR | No | Probe library directory. | ./probes |
| LLM_REDTEAM_OLLAMA_URL | No | Ollama base URL. | http://localhost:11434 |
| LLM_REDTEAM_REPORTS_DIR | No | Where export_report writes. | ./reports |
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| prompts | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| resources | {
"subscribe": false,
"listChanged": false
} |
| experimental | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| list_modelsA | List the LLM models installed in the local Ollama instance. |
| list_probesA | List every probe category and the probes it contains. |
| run_probeA | Run every probe in |
| run_singleA | Run one ad-hoc |
| export_reportA | Write the most recent run to timestamped JSON and Markdown in ./reports. |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 5 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: listing models, listing probes, running batch probes, running single prompts, and exporting reports. No overlap in functionality.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (export_, list_, list_, run_, run_) using snake_case, making the naming predictable and easy to understand.
With 5 tools covering model listing, probe listing, batch and single execution, and report export, the tool set is well-scoped for an LLM red-teaming server. No unnecessary tools or obvious omissions.
The core workflow of listing resources, running probes, and exporting results is covered. A minor gap is the lack of a tool to view report contents without writing to disk, but the export tool returns file paths that an agent can use with other tools to read files.