htb_sherlock_play
Get metadata and current VM/container status for a Sherlock play by providing its ID.
Instructions
Return Sherlock play metadata and current VM/container state.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| sherlock_id | Yes |
Get metadata and current VM/container status for a Sherlock play by providing its ID.
Return Sherlock play metadata and current VM/container state.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| sherlock_id | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, and description only states it returns data—does not disclose whether it has side effects, auth requirements, or other behavioral traits.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence with no waste, but could include more detail without becoming verbose; front-loaded with purpose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema and low complexity, the description lacks details on return format, what metadata includes, and what 'current state' entails.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 0%, and description does not explain sherlock_id or add any meaning beyond the schema's name and type.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly indicates the tool returns metadata and current VM/container state, which distinguishes it from sibling tools that start/stop/reset or provide task info.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance when to use this tool vs alternatives like htb_sherlock_info or htb_sherlock_progress; usage context is implied by name but not explicit.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/AeonDave/htb-app-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server