obsidian-pkm
Related Servers
Alternatives to obsidian-pkm
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceBidirectional MCP server that connects Claude with an Obsidian vault, enabling note management, full-text search, graph traversal, and daily notes operations.2,778 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that gives Claude AI direct access to your Obsidian vault, enabling natural language search, note creation, file management, and automated workflows.6,222 npm9MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMCP server exposing fast full-text and semantic search over an Obsidian vault, plus safe structured note read and write access for Claude.1Apache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceBuilt on Obsidian Vault, this MCP server integrates with Claude Code to provide personal knowledge management including note saving, full-text search, code graph extraction, and context resumption.1-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA Python MCP server that gives Claude long-term memory and full context of everything by connecting to an Obsidian vault, enabling context retrieval, note management, and automatic graph linking.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides full read/write access to an Obsidian vault, enabling searching, task management, wiki-link graph analysis, and attachment organization from an MCP client like Claude Code.-
TDQS
Scored across 18 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: read vs. peek vs. search vs. list; write vs. append vs. edit vs. update_frontmatter; links vs. neighborhood vs. link_health. There is no overlapping or confusing tool.
All tools use the 'vault_' prefix with snake_case names. Some are verb-noun (vault_read, vault_write) while others are noun-like (vault_tags, vault_neighborhood), but the pattern is predictable and consistent in style.
18 tools is slightly heavy but reasonable for a PKM server covering reading, writing, editing, linking, searching, querying, and vault maintenance. Each tool earns its place, but the count is at the upper edge of the ideal range.
The tool surface provides complete coverage of note lifecycle (create, read, update, delete), link management, metadata querying, and vault inspection. No obvious dead ends or missing critical operations for the domain.