Skip to main content
Glama
AdrianV101

obsidian-pkm

by AdrianV101

Related Servers

Alternatives to obsidian-pkm

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Bidirectional MCP server that connects Claude with an Obsidian vault, enabling note management, full-text search, graph traversal, and daily notes operations.
      2,778 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives Claude AI direct access to your Obsidian vault, enabling natural language search, note creation, file management, and automated workflows.
      6,222 npm
      9
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server exposing fast full-text and semantic search over an Obsidian vault, plus safe structured note read and write access for Claude.
      1
      Apache 2.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Built on Obsidian Vault, this MCP server integrates with Claude Code to provide personal knowledge management including note saving, full-text search, code graph extraction, and context resumption.
      1
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A Python MCP server that gives Claude long-term memory and full context of everything by connecting to an Obsidian vault, enabling context retrieval, note management, and automatic graph linking.
      -

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 18 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: read vs. peek vs. search vs. list; write vs. append vs. edit vs. update_frontmatter; links vs. neighborhood vs. link_health. There is no overlapping or confusing tool.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools use the 'vault_' prefix with snake_case names. Some are verb-noun (vault_read, vault_write) while others are noun-like (vault_tags, vault_neighborhood), but the pattern is predictable and consistent in style.

    Tool Count4/5

    18 tools is slightly heavy but reasonable for a PKM server covering reading, writing, editing, linking, searching, querying, and vault maintenance. Each tool earns its place, but the count is at the upper edge of the ideal range.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface provides complete coverage of note lifecycle (create, read, update, delete), link management, metadata querying, and vault inspection. No obvious dead ends or missing critical operations for the domain.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues