Skip to main content
Glama
Adithyenkandasamy

MCP File Manager

by Adithyenkandasamy
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP File Manager

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • personal-mcp-bridge

      wva2ccyk-prog
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables safe, read-only browsing of allowlisted local directories through MCP, providing tools to list roots, read files, and search text.
      MIT

    • Local File Management MCP

      IdoY12
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables file system operations such as listing, reading, and creating files within a scoped local project directory. It provides a secure way to manage local files through standardized MCP tools built with FastMCP.
      -

    • mcp-chatgpt-file-store

      tanongkiat
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables saving and managing files in a sandboxed local folder via MCP, with tools for listing, reading, writing, appending, searching, moving, and deleting files and directories.
      10
      -

    • MCP Filesystem Server

      AndrxsQ
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables file system operations such as listing directories, reading, writing, creating, and deleting files or directories through MCP.
      10 npm
      MIT

    • mcplocal

      aiautotool
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Local Files MCP server that lets MCP-compatible clients read, search, and modify files inside a sandboxed directory. Provides file management and coding workflow tools with security controls like path boundary enforcement and disabled deletion by default.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct file operation: listing directory contents, reading file content, fetching metadata, and searching filenames. There is no overlap, so an agent can easily choose the right tool.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Three tools use the verb_noun pattern (list_files, read_file, search_files), but file_info is a noun phrase rather than a verb action. The naming is mostly consistent but has a minor deviation.

    Tool Count5/5

    Four tools is a well-scoped number for a focused file management server. Each tool serves a clear purpose without unnecessary bloat.

    Completeness2/5

    The server only provides read-only operations (list, read, info, search). There are no tools for creating, editing, or deleting files, which are essential for a true file manager, leaving significant gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources