intigriti-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to intigriti-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseCqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to query and monitor public bug-bounty programs and scopes across major platforms, including new programs, target changes, fee and reward changes, and in-scope repository pushes through 18 tools.182MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants and agents to search bug bounty programs, retrieve policies and scopes, and check targets against active scope across HackerOne, YesWeHack, and Intigriti using personal API credentials.5MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceReal-time directory of every public VDP and bug bounty program460MIT
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables controlled, evidence-first web application penetration testing and bug bounty workflows, including scope enforcement, reconnaissance, human-approved surface triage, OWASP WSTG test execution, and SHA-256 evidence capture.103-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables users to analyze, save, compare, and track bounty opportunities through a stateful MCP workflow, build submission plans, and request the next best action across sessions.1MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceWraps multiple bug bounty platform APIs (HackerOne, Bugcrowd, etc.) behind a uniform MCP tool surface, enabling LLM agents to query programs, scope, and briefs across platforms through a single interface.-
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
The four tools have mostly distinct purposes, though list_programs and recommend_program both return program lists, and get_program_scope and diff_scope both fetch scope. Clear descriptions make the intended difference—overview vs. ranking and display vs. change tracking—usable, but mild confusion risk remains.
All tool names follow a consistent lowercase snake_case verb-first convention: list_programs, get_program_scope, diff_scope, recommend_program. The object follows the verb in each case, making the naming pattern predictable and easy to extend.
Four tools is a well-scoped size for a focused Intigriti program-monitoring server. Each tool addresses a necessary step in the workflow without redundancy or bloat.
For the inferred use case—program discovery, scope inspection, scope change tracking, and skill-based recommendations—the surface is largely complete. Submission/reporting workflows are absent, but they appear outside this server's narrow, deliberate scope.