Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to intigriti-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Wraps multiple bug bounty platform APIs (HackerOne, Bugcrowd, etc.) behind a uniform MCP tool surface, enabling LLM agents to query programs, scope, and briefs across platforms through a single interface.
      -
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to generate and manage specialized bug bounty hunting workflows including reconnaissance, vulnerability testing, OSINT gathering, and file upload testing. Provides REST API endpoints for comprehensive security assessments with intelligence-driven vulnerability prioritization.
      40
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables authorized pentest and bug bounty workflows from any MCP client, with scoped recon, per-host rate limits, and scanner output turned into deduplicated, triaged finding cards.
      9
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      AI-powered bug bounty hunting platform that integrates security tools (OWASP ZAP, Caido, Burp Suite) for automated reconnaissance, vulnerability testing, JavaScript analysis, and finding management with PostgreSQL storage.
      47
      44
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables authorized bug bounty automation via a scope-enforced MCP bridge, supporting web, secrets, mobile, and LLM red-team scanning, with reporting and advisory.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The four tools have mostly distinct purposes, though list_programs and recommend_program both return program lists, and get_program_scope and diff_scope both fetch scope. Clear descriptions make the intended difference—overview vs. ranking and display vs. change tracking—usable, but mild confusion risk remains.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent lowercase snake_case verb-first convention: list_programs, get_program_scope, diff_scope, recommend_program. The object follows the verb in each case, making the naming pattern predictable and easy to extend.

    Tool Count5/5

    Four tools is a well-scoped size for a focused Intigriti program-monitoring server. Each tool addresses a necessary step in the workflow without redundancy or bloat.

    Completeness4/5

    For the inferred use case—program discovery, scope inspection, scope change tracking, and skill-based recommendations—the surface is largely complete. Submission/reporting workflows are absent, but they appear outside this server's narrow, deliberate scope.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues