SunoMCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to SunoMCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI music generation and management through the Suno API, supporting text prompts, custom lyrics, track status monitoring, and credit management.16-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI music generation via Suno AI, allowing users to generate tracks with prompts and styles, and download them as MP3.1MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI music generation through Suno, allowing users to create songs with custom lyrics or AI-generated content, wait for completion, and download MP3 files.7ISC
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceAI music production with text-to-music generation, audio extension, remixing, and cover creation via AceDataCloud API.18449 PyPI2MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI-assisted music creation and management with Suno V6 via Kie.ai, offering generation, extension, cover creation, persona handling, and download tools through a zero-dependency stdio JSON-RPC interface.13MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI-powered music generation through natural language commands, supporting both inspiration mode (AI-generated lyrics and style) and custom mode (user-provided lyrics and parameters) to create songs with direct download links.43MIT
TDQS
Scored across 48 tools
Most tools have distinct purposes, but several near-duplicate families create selection ambiguity: generate_with_persona vs. generate_with_persona_vox, create_persona vs. create_voice, stems_music vs. all_stems_music vs. extract_vocals, and upload_* vs. regular extend/cover operations. The detailed descriptions help resolve these, but an agent still has to carefully distinguish similar variants.
The set overwhelmingly uses a predictable suno_ + snake_case convention with clear verb/resource naming such as suno_generate_music, suno_get_task, and suno_list_models. Minor deviations exist in names like suno_stems_music, suno_all_stems_music, suno_underpainting, and the broad suno_manage_project, but readability remains high.
At 48 tools, the server is substantially over the typical 3-15 range and sits near the 50-tool extreme. While the domain is broad, many tools are narrow variants that would be better grouped or exposed through parameters rather than as separate top-level tools.
The surface covers an unusually wide music-production lifecycle: generation, custom lyrics, personas, stems, covers, extensions, mashups, uploads, custom models, projects, task polling, and multiple export formats. Minor gaps remain, such as no obvious song history/list-generated-audio or delete-audio operation, but agents can largely work around these via task IDs.