Skip to main content
Glama

Search Google Places

serp_google_places
Read-only

Search Google for local places and businesses. Returns structured results for location-based queries.

Instructions

Search Google for local places and businesses.

Performs a Google Places search and returns structured place results.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pageNoPage number for pagination (default: 1).
queryYesThe search query string for local places/businesses search. Required.
numberNoNumber of results per page (default: 10). Note: More than 10 results may incur additional credits.
countryNoCountry code for localized results (e.g., 'us', 'cn', 'uk'). Default is 'us'.
languageNoLanguage code for results (e.g., 'en', 'zh-cn', 'fr'). Default is 'en'.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed7 schema fields changedv0.1.49
    • changedInput schema / properties / country / anyOf
      Previous value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "string"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]New value: +[
      +  {
      +    "maxLength": 32,
      +    "minLength": 1,
      +    "type": "string"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "type": "null"
      +  }
      +]
    • changedInput schema / properties / language / anyOf
      Previous value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "string"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]New value: +[
      +  {
      +    "maxLength": 32,
      +    "minLength": 1,
      +    "type": "string"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "type": "null"
      +  }
      +]
    • changedInput schema / properties / number / anyOf
      Previous value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "integer"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]New value: +[
      +  {
      +    "maximum": 100,
      +    "minimum": 1,
      +    "type": "integer"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "type": "null"
      +  }
      +]
    • changedInput schema / properties / page / anyOf
      Previous value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "integer"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]New value: +[
      +  {
      +    "maximum": 100,
      +    "minimum": 1,
      +    "type": "integer"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "type": "null"
      +  }
      +]
    • addedInput schema / properties / query / maxLength
      Added value: +2048
    • addedInput schema / properties / query / minLength
      Added value: +1
    • addedInput schema / properties / query / pattern
      Added value: +".*\\S.*"
  2. Addedv0.1.46
  3. Removedv0.1.45
  4. First observedv0.1.0

TDQS

C2.9/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, destructiveHint=false, and openWorldHint=true, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds nothing beyond them: no mention of credit consumption for large result pages (which the schema hints at), rate limits, or result-set behavior. The one sentence about returning structured results is essentially a restatement of the purpose.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

It is short, but the second sentence ('Performs a Google Places search and returns structured place results') largely restates the first and the title rather than adding information, so not every sentence earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With annotations covering the safety profile and an output schema covering the return shape, the description only needs to establish scope and routing. It establishes scope adequately but omits the disambiguation against serp_google_maps, which is the main informational gap for this tool family.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so all five parameters (query, page, number, country, language) are already documented with defaults, ranges, and formats in the schema. The description supplies no additional parameter meaning, which lands it at the baseline 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb (Search) and a specific resource (Google local places and businesses), which distinguishes it from generic web search siblings like serp_google_search and serp_google_news. It does not, however, explicitly contrast itself with the closest sibling, serp_google_maps, leaving the agent to infer the boundary between a places lookup and a maps lookup.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance and no named alternative, despite the sibling list containing several overlapping search tools (serp_google_search, serp_google_maps) whose selection criteria an agent would need. Usage is only weakly implied by the resource name.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.