midjourney_translate

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description bears full responsibility. It discloses that translation is optimized for image generation and returns English text ready as a prompt. This is adequate for a straightforward translation tool, though it does not mention any rate limits or error handling.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is three short paragraphs plus a return line, breaking down purpose, usage, and output. Every sentence is meaningful, and there is no wasted text.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simple nature of the tool (single parameter, output schema exists), the description covers purpose, when to use, and what it returns. It is fully complete for an agent to decide when to invoke this tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema description coverage is 100%, giving a baseline of 3. The description adds minimal extra value beyond the schema, only rephrasing that the content is Chinese text for translation. The schema already describes the parameter adequately.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states that the tool translates Chinese text to English specifically for Midjourney prompts, with a specific verb 'Translate' and resource 'Chinese text to English'. It distinguishes itself from siblings which are all other Midjourney tool categories (e.g., imagine, blend) that serve different purposes.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides a clear list of when to use the tool (Chinese description needing translation, converting Chinese prompts, needing English for better results). While no explicit when-not or alternatives are given, the context of Midjourney tools makes it clear that this is for translation only, not other tasks.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.