The two tools have clearly distinct responsibilities: one creates/submits a video task and the other retrieves its progress/output. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.

Both tool names follow the same `maestro_<verb>_<noun>` pattern, using consistent snake_case and clear action words. The naming convention is uniform and predictable.

Two tools is minimal but works well for a focused async create-and-poll workflow. It is slightly under the typical well-scoped range, but each tool serves a necessary and distinct role.

The core lifecycle of creating a video and retrieving its results is covered. Missing task management operations like listing, canceling, or deleting tasks are minor gaps for this narrow domain.