luma_list_actions

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, but description adequately discloses it returns a categorized list. No side effects implied. Could mention idempotence but not required.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Four sentences, front-loaded with purpose. No wasted words. Perfectly concise for a list operation.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given zero parameters, an output schema exists, and sibling tools are action tools, description is complete. Could mention 'use before calling other luma_* tools' but adequate.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

No parameters defined; schema coverage is 100% vacuously. Baseline 4 applies as description adds no param info but none needed.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states 'List all available Luma API actions and corresponding tools.' Verb 'list' and resource 'actions' is specific. Distinguishes from sibling action tools like luma_generate_video.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicit context: 'Reference guide for what each action does and which tool to use.' Implies usage for discovery. No exclusions needed as it's a unique list operation.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.