get_snippet

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so the description carries full burden. It reveals only path assumptions ('Paths assume assets in vendor/rolldate/'), but doesn't disclose return shape, error behavior, or side-effect-free nature. For a simple getter, still lacks behavioral detail.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, front-loaded with the core action; path assumption in second sentence is relevant. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema and no annotations, the description is short but sufficient for a basic snippet fetcher. However, it doesn't mention how to discover available scenario ids (sibling list_scenarios) or what the snippet output looks like beyond 'ready-to-use'.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

All parameters are fully described in the schema (100% coverage), including enums and defaults, so baseline 3 applies. The description adds little beyond noting the default path assumption.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description uses specific verb 'get' and resource 'ready-to-use RollDate JS and/or HTML snippet', and explicitly scopes to 'for a scenario'. This clearly distinguishes it from sibling tools like get_options and get_methods.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit when/when-not or alternative tool guidance is provided. The description implies use when a snippet is needed, but doesn't reference sibling tools or mention prerequisites like list_scenarios.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.