Skip to main content
Glama
Abidit

phi-guard-mcp

by Abidit
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to phi-guard-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • perimeter-mcp

      Cocongas
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables coding assistants to check code for common health-data mistakes locally without an account, and, with a configured core service, de-identify clinical text, restore placeholders, and append tamper-evident audit log entries.
      1
      7 npm
      MIT

    • netallion-mcp-lite

      netallion
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Scans text and files for common secrets (AWS, GitHub, etc.) and redacts them to prevent credential leakage in AI-assisted development. Runs entirely locally with no telemetry.
      25 PyPI
      MIT

    • secretscan

      wedo911
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Scans diffs, files, and snippets for leaked secrets like AWS keys, GitHub tokens, and private keys, returning redacted findings while running fully locally without network calls.
      1
      MIT

    • TruthGate MCP

      wu00112238
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables local privacy scanning and masking of secrets and PII, verifies test-suite integrity to prevent silent fake success, and inspects or blocks destructive terminal and SQL commands before execution.
      4
      Apache 2.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    redact_suggest operates on raw text for de-identification, while scan_code analyzes source code for risksy data flows. Their inputs, outputs, and use cases are completely distinct, so an agent should have no trouble separating them.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    scan_code follows a clear verb_noun pattern, but redact_suggest is an awkward combination that is not clearly verb+object. With only two tools, the inconsistency is noticeable though both names remain understandable.

    Tool Count3/5

    Two tools feels thin for a PHI protection server, though the pair does cover two meaningful workflows: runtime text redaction and pre-ship code scanning. It is a borderline scope rather than an obviously excessive or trivial one.

    Completeness3/5

    The set covers redaction suggestion and source scanning, but leavoves out supporting operations like pattern configuration, allowlisting, detailed finding management, or remediation/apply flows. These are notal gaps that agents may need to work around.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources