Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
social0-mcp

social0-mcp

by Abhishek-B-R
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

get_publish_status

Check the publishing status of a post with its tracking ID. Get overall status, per-platform progress, and any errors.

Instructions

Check the publishing status of a post using its tracking ID. Returns overall status, per-platform progress, and any errors.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "tracking_id": "<tracking_id>"
    },
    "name": "get_publish_status"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
tracking_idYesTracking ID returned from publish operations

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv0.3.0

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. The description mentions return values (overall status, per-platform progress, errors) but does not disclose if the operation is read-only, safe to replay, or has rate limits. Adequate but not detailed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence that efficiently states the purpose and what it returns. No waste.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema, but the description explains return components (status, progress, errors). Although lacking structure details, it is reasonably complete for a simple status-checking tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema has 100% description coverage for the single parameter. The description reinforces the tracking_id's purpose but adds no new meaning beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Check' and the resource 'publishing status of a post', and specifies the method using tracking ID. It effectively distinguishes from sibling tools like publish_post or get_post.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage after a publish operation to check status, but lacks explicit guidance on when to use vs alternatives, or when not to use. No exclusions or alternative tool mentions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools