Skip to main content
Glama

debug_retrieval

Diagnose why specific memory nodes are retrieved for a query by analyzing embedding previews, context-window routing scores, and comparing flat and tiered node matches.

Instructions

Diagnose memory retrieval ranking for a query. Returns query embedding preview, context-window routing scores, selected windows, flat top nodes, and tiered top nodes for comparison.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
queryYesNatural-language search query to diagnose.
max_nodesNoMaximum number of flat and tiered node matches to include.
max_depthNoRelationship traversal depth for the flat retrieval comparison.
agent_idNoOptional agent or client identifier used to partition memory.
projectNoOptional project or workspace name used to partition memory.
session_idNoOptional conversation or run identifier used to partition memory.
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, and the description does not disclose read-only nature, permissions, or side effects. The diagnostic purpose is implied but not elaborated.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences, front-loaded with primary purpose, no superfluous content.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema; description lists return items but lacks structure or type details. Lacks usage context for a diagnostic tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so parameters are documented. The description adds no extra semantic value beyond what the schema provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool diagnoses memory retrieval ranking, listing specific return items. It is distinct from sibling tools like query_graph.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, no prerequisites or exclusions mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Abhigyan-Shekhar/Waggle-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server