Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to github-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server exposing GitHub tools for issues, pull requests, and code browsing via the GitHub REST API. Designed for local LLM clients with flat arguments and streamable HTTP support.
      15
      -
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that allows Claude and other MCP-compatible LLMs to interact with the GitHub API, supporting features like creating issues, getting repository information, listing issues, and searching repositories.
      4
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP (Model Context Protocol) server for GitHub API integration. This server provides comprehensive tools for interacting with GitHub repositories, issues, pull requests, branches, and code search through a unified interface.
      15
      12 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A minimal MCP server for GitHub that enables browsing repos, reading code, searching, and getting insights through natural language via Claude, Cursor, or any MCP client.
      7
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that connects Claude AI directly to the GitHub API, enabling natural language queries for live repository data, issues, PRs, and contributions.
      1
      -

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct GitHub resource (issues, pull requests, files, code search) with clear boundaries. No two tools could be confused for the same task.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow the verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., create_issue, list_pull_requests, search_code), providing a predictable and uniform naming convention.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 7 tools, the server is well-scoped for basic GitHub interactions. The number is neither too sparse nor excessive for its purpose.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool set is missing fundamental operations like update and delete for issues and pull requests, and lacks the ability to create pull requests. This creates significant gaps that hinder common workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues