Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
Shopmonkey MCP Server

Shopmonkey MCP Server

by AbbottDevelopments
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

search_parts

Search the Shopmonkey parts catalog by name, number, or description to find matching parts. Supports pagination with limit and skip parameters.

Instructions

Search the parts catalog in Shopmonkey. Use for finding parts by name, number, or description.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "query": "<query>"
    },
    "name": "search_parts"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
skipNoNumber of records to skip for pagination (default: 0)
limitNoMaximum number of results to return (default: 25)
queryYesSearch query for parts (name, part number, or description)

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changedv1.1.1
    • removedInput schema / properties / page
      Removed value: -{
-  "description": "Page number for pagination (default: 1)",
-  "type": "number"
-}
    • addedInput schema / properties / skip
      Added value: +{
+  "description": "Number of records to skip for pagination (default: 0)",
+  "type": "number"
+}
  2. First observedv1.0.0

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries the burden. 'Search' implies read-only behavior without side effects, though explicit mention of non-modifying nature is absent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences conveying purpose and usage with no redundant wording. Front-loaded with the primary action.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Sufficient for a simple search tool. Missing explicit details on pagination or return format, but not critical given the low complexity and absence of output schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema covers all 3 parameters with clear descriptions. The description adds no additional semantic value beyond the schema, so baseline score of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clear verb 'search' with resource 'parts catalog' and specific search criteria (name, number, description). Distinct from sibling tools like list_inventory_parts and get_inventory_part.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly states when to use ('Use for finding parts by name, number, or description'), but does not contrast with listing or getting a single part. Provides adequate context for common search scenarios.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools