Skip to main content
Glama
Abacore-net

acn-preflight-mcp

by Abacore-net

Related Servers

Alternatives to acn-preflight-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding assistants and trading bots to verify smart contracts, test honeypot traps, assess DEX liquidity, and check wallet counterparty risk before deploying or trading capital on Base. It exposes preflight clearance, token audits, KYA reputation, and web-scraping tools with free and paid x402 tiers.
      7
      524 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to check an EVM address on Base for risk (safe, caution, danger) before sending funds, with reasons, paid per call via x402 from the user's own wallet.
      6
      51 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to pay per call for live package-safety and GitHub merge-readiness trust signals via the x402 protocol.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to run a free fail-closed preflight gate on x402 payment challenges and transactions before signing, plus five USDC-paid on-chain truth checks covering arbitrage profitability, token safety, swap routing, quote validation, and trade sizing. Each check returns a verdict with pinned-block evidence and a verifiable receipt.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Trust layer for AI agents: 22 pay-per-call x402 tools for scam and fraud checks, payment pre-flight, wallet screening, policy approvals, contact extraction and company research. Free preview with no wallet; paid calls settle in USDC on Base.
      22
      104 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    payment_preflight is clearly distinct, but repo_contribution_readiness and bounty_reality_check both target pre-contribution GitHub checks and could be confused. The descriptions clarify that one is about repository health and the other about bounty/issue evidence, but the boundary is somewhat subtle.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names use lowercase snake_case noun phrases that lead with the domain (repo, payment, bounty). They are readable and consistent in style, though they mix suffixes like _readiness, _preflight, and _reality_check rather than following a single verb_noun pattern.

    Tool Count4/5

    Three tools is minimal but reasonable for a focused preflight server. Each tool covers a distinct preflight scenario and none feels redundant, though the surface is on the small side.

    Completeness4/5

    For a preflight-focused server, the three core scenarios (repository, payment, bounty/issue) are covered and give an agent the checks needed before acting. There are minor gaps, such as no generic environment or dependency preflight, but they do not create dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues