whoop-get-cycle-by-id
Retrieve a cycle by its unique ID. Access detailed cycle data from WHOOP biometrics.
Instructions
Get the cycle for the specified ID
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| cycleId | Yes | ID of the cycle to retrieve |
Retrieve a cycle by its unique ID. Access detailed cycle data from WHOOP biometrics.
Get the cycle for the specified ID
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| cycleId | Yes | ID of the cycle to retrieve |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations and description does not disclose behavioral traits like authentication requirements, error handling, or potential side-effects. The 'Get' verb implies read-only, but this is not explicit.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single concise sentence, but lacks structure (e.g., no title, no front-loading of key info). It is adequate but minimal.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple GET-by-ID tool with no output schema and no annotations, the description omits necessary context such as return format, error behavior, and prerequisites (e.g., authentication). Incomplete for safe agent usage.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, and the description adds no new meaning beyond the schema's 'ID of the cycle to retrieve'. Baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool retrieves a cycle by ID, distinguishing it from collection tools like whoop-get-cycle-collection.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives (e.g., get-cycle-collection). The agent must infer from the parameter and sibling names.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/AaronRoeF/whoop-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server