Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to 9xvision

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Let AI agents watch videos: local transcripts, speaker labels, scenes, chapters and exact-moment search from any video URL or file. Fully local, no API keys.
      4
      3
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to inspect UI screen recordings as token-efficient image sheets with changed regions boxed, single-frame flicker flagged, and speech aligned to frames. Exposes watch_video and zoom_video tools so agents can pull dense keyframes across any time range or one sharp full-resolution frame, all processed locally.
      25 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables an agent to process local video files and then read, search and inspect the results: timestamped transcripts, on-screen text and key frames as images. Everything runs locally, so an agent can answer questions like how to perform a task shown in a screencast or meeting recording.
      198 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables any agent or LLM to read and query a video cheaply from a locally built context index, exposing text-layer overviews, per-shot thumbnails, on-demand frame retrieval, transcript search, and indexing tools. The server makes no model calls and needs no API key, letting the calling agent's own model reason over the text layer and fetched frames.
      1
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 15 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target distinct actions/resources: watch analyses video, frame extracts a single frame, zoom builds a dense grid, diff compares moments, search finds moments, and the live_* tools handle real-time perception. There is some overlap among frame, look, zoom, and image for inspecting visual detail, but the descriptions mostly clarify when to use each.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The set mixes noun names (frame, image, images, qa) with verb names (watch, look, zoom, diff, search) and a prefixed live_ group plus list_watches. The live_ tools are consistently prefixed, but overall there is no single predictable verb_noun or noun pattern.

    Tool Count5/5

    Fifteen tools fit a rich visual/video analysis domain with distinct areas: video analysis, image albums, live sessions, search, comparison, and QA. The count is well within a reasonable scope and each tool appears to serve a specific workflow.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers core workflows for video/image/live analysis: ingest, inspect, search, compare, QA, and live snapshots. Minor gaps exist around managing cached watches/albums (e.g. no delete or rename operations), but these are not central to the stated analysis purpose.