Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
AQuietRiver

Local Memory MCP

by AQuietRiver
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Local Memory MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • moss-brain

      Naut1cal5
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides semantic memory with search, related-content traversal, and write-back capabilities, all powered by local embeddings of your notes, documents, and chat histories.
      3
      MIT

    • SynaBun

      danilokhury
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible AI coding tools to store and recall persistent memories across sessions and projects, with keyword and semantic search backed by a local SQLite database.
      118 npm
      70
      Apache 2.0

    • mesh-memory

      dklymentiev
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Self-hosted semantic memory for AI agents. Save worklogs, decisions, and notes via MCP, then recall them across sessions by meaning rather than keyword. Backed by Postgres + pgvector with local embeddings (multilingual-e5-base).
      1
      MIT

    • Memento

      iAchilles
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A local, fully-offline MCP memory server that enables persistent storage and retrieval of information using SQLite with both keyword and semantic vector search capabilities.
      10
      34 npm
      13
      MIT

    • light-agent-memory-mcp-server

      AliYar-Khan
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides persistent, searchable memory for AI agents across any MCP-compatible client, storing project context, user preferences, and session learnings locally in SQLite with tools to save, retrieve, search, and manage them.
      12
      9 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Context All Your Agents Can ShareAgents share what they learn, hand off work, and hold it when you switch models. Start with 5 GB free.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a distinct, non-overlapping purpose: search retrieves, store adds, wipe deletes. No ambiguity between them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (search_memory, store_memory, wipe_project_memories).

    Tool Count5/5

    3 tools cover the core operations for a local memory server (search, store, delete). The count is well-scoped and earns its place.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers essential memory operations, but lacks an update or list tool. However, delete+re-store can update, and search serves as discovery. Minor gap.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources