Skip to main content
Glama
ANAMIZED

OpenGOS

by ANAMIZED
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to OpenGOS

Related Servers

  • GrantIQ MCP

    bch1212
    F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    A paid MCP server that gives AI agents instant, structured access to every open US federal grant and contract opportunity.
    1
    -

  • Grants.gov MCP Server

    jhalsey87
    F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that provides access to the Grants.gov API for searching and retrieving federal grant opportunities.
    -

  • moltawards-mcp

    bbriggs1990
    A
    license
    B
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    MCP server for MoltAwards that enables AI agents to search, filter, and engage with federal and state government contract opportunities, including teaming and commenting.
    35
    MIT

  • people-mcp

    OlegNickeshin
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Open MCP server for AI agents to discover people, jobs, collaborators and projects through semantic search over human-published context.
    MIT

  • gitcontribute

    morluto
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    MCP server that helps coding agents research and prepare GitHub contributions by gathering repository guidance, related work, code context, and validation evidence into a local SQLite corpus, without ever writing to GitHub.
    116 npm
    3
    MIT
Deploy Server
One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

TDQS

B3.4/5.0

Scored across 9 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a distinct purpose: general federal grant search, detailed grant retrieval, open-source-specific grants, public-goods funding, NSF awards, corpus maintenance, evaluation, profile management, and proposal drafting. No two tools overlap significantly.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with lowercase underscores (search_grants, get_grant_details, list_public_goods_funding, etc.). Verbs like search, get, list, and refresh clearly indicate the action, and the pattern is uniform across the set.

Tool Count5/5

Nine tools is well within the ideal range for a funding-discovery and proposal-drafting server. Each tool addresses a distinct part of the workflow without redundancy or bloat.

Completeness4/5

The tool set covers core workflows: discovering grants and non-grant funding, retrieving details, creating/updating profiles, drafting proposals, and maintaining/evaluating the corpus. Minor gaps exist, such as no delete profile or no dedicated detail fetch for public-goods opportunities, but these are not likely to cause agent failures.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues

Resources