Skip to main content
Glama
AM253906
by AM253906
README.md
# metrc-mcp

An MCP (Model Context Protocol) server for the [METRC](https://www.metrc.com/) cannabis track-and-trace API, focused on the workflows a processor/manufacturer actually runs day to day: checking active package inventory, resolving tags, reconciling transfer manifests, and pulling lab test results.

I built this after several years running licensed processing operations, where "check METRC" is a dozen-times-a-day interruption. Wrapping the API as MCP tools lets an assistant answer questions like *"which of our active packages are still awaiting lab results?"* or *"reconcile yesterday's incoming manifest against what we received"* directly against the compliance system of record.

## Scope

This deliberately does not wrap the full METRC API. METRC exposes a couple hundred endpoints across cultivation, retail, and processing; most integrations touch a small fraction. This server covers the processor slice:

| Tool | What it does |
| --- | --- |
| `list_facilities` | Facilities visible to your user key, with license numbers |
| `list_active_packages` | Active inventory with testing state and hold status |
| `get_package` | Full record for one package by tag label |
| `finish_package` | Mark a zero-quantity package finished (write, gated) |
| `list_items` | The item catalog packages are created against |
| `list_incoming_transfers` / `list_outgoing_transfers` | Manifests in and out |
| `get_lab_test_results` | Test results for a package by numeric ID |

Cultivation (plants, harvests) and retail (sales receipts) endpoints are out of scope. Adding a domain means one new file in `src/tools/`.

## Safety model

METRC is a legal record. Mistakes in it are compliance findings, not bugs.

- **Read-only by default.** Write tools throw unless `METRC_ALLOW_WRITES=true` is set explicitly.
- **Sandbox support.** Set `METRC_SANDBOX=true` to target your state's sandbox instance. Do not enable writes against a production license until the workflow has been tested there.
- **Bounded output.** List tools cap at 100 rows and say so, rather than flooding the model's context with a busy facility's full inventory.

## METRC auth, briefly

METRC deploys per state (`api-ok.metrc.com`, `api-ca.metrc.com`, ...) and authenticates with HTTP Basic where the **username is the software vendor's API key** and the **password is the user's API key**. The vendor key identifies the integrator; the user key determines which facilities you can see. Both are required. This trips up most first-time integrators, who expect a single bearer token.

Endpoint paths and payload fields can differ slightly between states and API versions. This server targets the v2 endpoints; if your state lags on a particular resource, the 404 error message will say which path failed.

## Setup

```bash
npm install
npm run build
```

Configure via environment (see `.env.example`):

```
METRC_STATE=ok                  # two-letter state code
METRC_VENDOR_API_KEY=...        # from your METRC vendor account
METRC_USER_API_KEY=...          # from your METRC user profile
METRC_LICENSE_NUMBER=...        # optional default license
METRC_SANDBOX=true              # strongly recommended to start
METRC_ALLOW_WRITES=false        # keep false until tested
```

Register with an MCP client (Claude Desktop shown):

```json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "metrc": {
      "command": "node",
      "args": ["/path/to/metrc-mcp/dist/index.js"],
      "env": {
        "METRC_STATE": "ok",
        "METRC_VENDOR_API_KEY": "...",
        "METRC_USER_API_KEY": "...",
        "METRC_SANDBOX": "true"
      }
    }
  }
}
```

## Testing

```bash
npm test
```

METRC vendor sandbox access requires completing METRC's training and API User Agreement process, so this client is validated against a mocked METRC instance instead (`test/mock-metrc.ts`), with payloads shaped like the real v2 responses. The suite covers two layers:

- **Client tests** — Basic auth construction (vendor key as username, user key as password), query serialization, 429 retry with backoff and eventual surfacing, normalization of METRC's inconsistent error shapes, and license resolution.
- **End-to-end stdio tests** — the compiled server is spawned as a real MCP process and driven over JSON-RPC, the same path Claude Desktop uses. These verify tool registration, response summarization, readable tool-level errors, and that write tools are refused in read-only mode *before any network call is attempted*.

`METRC_BASE_URL` exists solely as the test hook that points the client at the mock.

## Development

```bash
npm run dev        # run from source via tsx
npm run build      # compile to dist/
```

The layering is: `src/metrc/client.ts` owns HTTP, auth, timeouts, and 429 retry; `src/tools/*` define MCP tools per domain and summarize responses; `src/config.ts` validates environment once at startup. Tool handlers never touch `fetch` directly.

## License

MIT

TDQS

A4/5.0

Scored across 8 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a distinct resource and action: facilities, active packages, single package lookup, finishing packages, items, incoming/outgoing transfers, and lab results. Even the package-related tools are clearly separated by scope (list vs. get vs. lab results).

Naming Consistency5/5

Tool names consistently follow a verb_noun pattern using snake_case, with list_ for collection queries, get_ for single-record lookups, and finish_ for the one mutation. This makes the toolset predictable and easy for an agent to route.

Tool Count5/5

Eight tools is a well-scoped size for this domain. Each tool covers a meaningful part of the METRC workflow without unnecessary redundancy or bloat.

Completeness3/5

The read-side coverage is solid for facilities, packages, items, transfers, and lab results, and finish_package provides one mutation. However, common lifecycle operations such as creating or adjusting packages, receiving incoming transfers, and creating outgoing transfers are missing, leaving agents able to observe but not fully complete many compliance workflows.

Maintenance

ActivitySlowing
ResponsivenessNo issues