A
licenseA
qualityA
maintenanceOAuth-protected Google Search Console MCP for analytics, URL inspection, sitemap management, indexing requests, and SEO diagnostics. Open-source Cloudflare Workers implementation with 17 tools.
17
4,051 npm
5
MIT
Web Validator by DigestSEO
by AKzar1el
Related Servers
Alternatives to Web Validator by DigestSEO
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceAI visibility tracker MCP server. Track brand citations across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini & Google AI Overviews. Self-host on Cloudflare Workers. GEO/AEO.122,344 npm46MIT
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants and coding agents to audit, compare, and optimize websites for performance, SEO, AEO, GEO, and AI crawler accessibility directly from chat or development workflows.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to crawl live websites, audit AEO readiness, generate Schema.org @graph JSON-LD, llms.txt, ai.txt, and robots.txt, inject structured data into HTML, validate optimizations, and retrieve framework-specific code snippets.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to run live SEO/readiness audits against 50+ AI crawlers, validate schema and robots.txt, and generate llms.txt, robots.txt, and JSON-LD files directly from MCP-compatible clients like Claude Desktop and Cursor.8728 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceIntegrates SEO analysis and Google Search Console data directly into Claude Code and Cursor. Performs real-time site audits, detects technical SEO issues, validates meta tags, generates structured data, and provides AI-powered recommendations for both production sites and local development servers.19135 npm3MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI coding assistants to test web accessibility by scanning URLs, detecting violations, and running focused audits on keyboard navigation, screen reader compatibility, and WCAG criteria — all within the assistant's loop.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to audit websites with live measurements, find public contact emails, check SSL expiry, and draft verifiable outreach messages.MIT
TDQS
A4/5.0
Scored across 8 tools
Disambiguation4/5
Each tool targets a distinct validation concern (HTML, CSS, links, schema, SEO, screenshots), and the two HTML validators are clearly separated by local vs. URL source. Minor overlap exists between report.validation and the individual tools it aggregates, but the descriptions make the difference explicit (combined report vs. single-purpose check).
Naming Consistency5/5
All tool names follow a consistent dot-separated pattern where the first segment identifies the resource (html, css, links, schema, seo, report) and the second segment specifies the action or variant (local, url, broken, markup, metadata, validation). This is highly predictable and readable.
Tool Count5/5
Eight tools is well-scoped for a web validation server. Each tool addresses a meaningful aspect of validation or analysis, and none feel redundant or superfluous. The count supports a coherent workflow without overwhelming the agent.
Completeness4/5
The tool surface covers HTML validation from file and URL, CSS file validation, broken link checking, JSON-LD syntax, SEO metadata analysis, screenshots, and an aggregate report. A minor gap is the lack of a CSS URL validation tool, but the core validation workflows are well covered for the apparent domain.
Maintenance
ActivityActive
ResponsivenessUnresponsive