Monitoring AIops
Related Servers
Alternatives to Monitoring AIops
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceAsynchronous MCP server for unified multi-platform network infrastructure management, providing 97 tools across 10 connectors including SSH, MikroTik, Palo Alto, Aruba, Graylog, LibreNMS, Cisco APIC/NDFC, and Panorama.9722-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for NinjaOne RMM that exposes tools for managing organizations, devices, alerts, ticketing, and automation/scripting via NinjaOne's Public API v2.-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server enabling AI assistants to interact with your LogicMonitor, providing 125 tools for comprehensive monitoring and management operations.708713AGPL 3.0
- AlicenseCqualityFmaintenanceComprehensive MCP server for integrating with Zabbix monitoring systems, providing 90+ API tools across 19 categories for monitoring, alerting, and infrastructure management.10015MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server for the NinjaOne RMM platform, enabling tools to manage devices, organizations, alerts, jobs, and policies through NinjaOne's API.25Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for Domotz network monitoring and management. Enables AI assistants to query network devices, alerts, and topology via the Domotz API.210Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 42 tools
Tools are mostly distinct, with platform prefixes and separate resource names making selection clear. The main ambiguity is between pause_sensor/schedule_maintenance_prtg and mute_alerts/schedule_maintenance/unmanage_node, where similar suppression semantics overlap despite helpful descriptions.
All names are snake_case and readable, but no single convention is followed: reads mix noun-first names like nodes_list and zabbix_problems with verb-first names like list_events and list_unmanaged. Platform prefixes are also applied unevenly, such as pause_sensor being PRTG-specific while other PRTG tools use the prtg_ prefix.
At 42 tools this is well beyond the 25+ threshold and creates a heavy selection burden for agents. The three-platform scope justifies a larger surface, but it would be cleaner split into per-platform servers or consolidated further.
The set covers the core monitoring lifecycle: health reads, alerts, history, acknowledgements, pause/resume, maintenance windows, mute/unmute, unmanage/remanage, node removal, and SWQL for arbitrary SolarWinds queries. Minor gaps exist, such as no SolarWinds metric history wrapper and limited PRTG/Zabbix write operations, but these are workable via existing tools.