Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to minio-aiops

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Governed Docker + Portainer container-host operations (non-Kubernetes) — restart-loop, resource-pressure, and image/volume-bloat RCA, with guarded lifecycle writes, unbypassable audit logging (MCP + CLI), budget/runaway guards, dry-run, and undo/rollback.
      38
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Governed CI/CD operations for self-hosted GitLab and Gitea — pipeline-failure, runner, artifact-bloat, and stale-branch RCA, with unbypassable audit logging (MCP + CLI), budget/runaway guards, dry-run, and undo/rollback.
      28
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Governed SSO/IAM operations for Keycloak and Authentik — login-failure, stale-permission, client-config, and MFA RCA, with unbypassable audit logging (MCP + CLI), budget/runaway guards, dry-run, and undo/rollback.
      29
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Governed Prometheus + Grafana operations — firing-alert and scrape-target RCA, alert noise/flapping analysis, silences, and dashboards, with unbypassable audit logging (MCP + CLI), budget/runaway guards, dry-run, and undo/rollback.
      39
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Governed MySQL + MariaDB DBA operations — slow-query, lock-wait/deadlock, replication, and fragmentation RCA, with unbypassable audit logging (MCP + CLI), budget/runaway guards, dry-run, and undo/rollback.
      35
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Governed reverse-proxy operations for Traefik, Caddy, and HAProxy — backend-health, cert-expiry, 5xx, and route-conflict RCA, with unbypassable audit logging (MCP + CLI), budget/runaway guards, dry-run, and undo/rollback.
      28
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 48 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clear distinct targets (bucket, object, user, health), and descriptions effectively separate potentially overlapping diagnostics like capacity_rca vs usage_by_bucket. However, the high number of health/status/audit tools (server_info, cluster_status, fleet_overview, health_cluster) creates mild selection ambiguity even with good descriptions.

    Naming Consistency2/5

    Naming conventions are inconsistent: some tools use verb_noun (set_bucket_policy, create_user), some use noun_verb (bucket_delete, undo_list), and many use noun suffix patterns (bucket_policy_get, bucket_ls). This mixing of ordering and style makes the set feel less predictable.

    Tool Count2/5

    48 tools is well beyond the typical well-scoped range (3-15) and even the 'heavy' 16-25 threshold. While the MinIO domain is broad, many tools could be consolidated (e.g., separate bucket getters, multiple health endpoints), making the surface feel bloated.

    Completeness3/5

    The set covers core bucket lifecycle, IAM management, health/diagnostics, and WORM/retention operations, but has notable gaps: no object deletion (preventing bucket emptying), no setters for bucket encryption or tags, and no custom policy creation. These missing operations leave some workflows incomplete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues