Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Inference AIops

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      VibOps MCP is the control plane between your AI agents and your GPU infrastructure. 74 tools covering: GPU fleet management (deploy, scale, monitor across NVIDIA, AMD, Intel, AWS, Google, Groq), Agent Infrastructure Control Plane (per-agent GPU cost, budget enforcement, model policies, dependency graph), governance (AI Act, SOC 2, immutable HMAC audit chain), and GPU FinOps (chargeback, waste..)..
      74
      18
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to manage GPU training end-to-end through natural language, including submitting and scheduling jobs, monitoring logs and metrics, diagnosing failures, comparing runs, and recommending the best checkpoints.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform observability analysis across Prometheus-compatible metrics and logs without prior vendor knowledge, including signal discovery, entity topology resolution, root-cause analysis, correlation, and capacity forecasting through natural-language anchors.
      Apache 2.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables users to investigate infrastructure incidents in plain English, correlate observability and deploy data with runbooks, and get evidence-backed root-cause proposals with approval-gated remediation.
      5
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI-driven incident response by connecting Claude to monitoring tools like Prometheus, Grafana, Loki, PagerDuty, and Slack for automated investigation and runbook generation.
      9
      -

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 39 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Several tools are near-duplicates differentiated only by engine-specificity: request_metrics vs engine_request_metrics, queue_depth vs engine_queue_depth, and diagnose_latency_spike vs diagnose_engine_latency. model_list and engine_inventory also overlap in listing served models, making tool selection ambiguous.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Names are consistently snake_case but mix object-first patterns (model_list, deployment_status, engine_health) with action-first verbs (model_deploy, scale_replicas_up, diagnose_latency_spike). Phrasal names like scale_to_zero and undo_apply add further inconsistency, though the naming is still readable and not chaotic.

    Tool Count2/5

    39 tools is excessive for the domain and the count is inflated by redundant vLLM-specific/engine-agnostic pairs and three refuse-with-teaching stubs (replica_restart, routing_policy_update, drain_replica). Many tools could be consolidated, so the set feels bloated rather than well-scoped.

    Completeness3/5

    The surface covers model lifecycle, scaling, autoscaling, monitoring, diagnostics, cost, and undo, which is broad for an inference AIops server. However, notable gaps include no in-place deployment config update, no log/event retrieval, no request tracing, and several advertised actions are stubs that refuse to execute.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues