Inference AIops
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to Inference AIops
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides AI assistants with direct access to Red Hat OpenShift AI observability data, enabling querying of Prometheus metrics, Alertmanager alerts, Loki logs, Grafana dashboards, and Kubernetes cluster state to troubleshoot vLLM inference workloads.5MIT

vibops-mcpofficial
AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceVibOps MCP is the control plane between your AI agents and your GPU infrastructure. 74 tools covering: GPU fleet management (deploy, scale, monitor across NVIDIA, AMD, Intel, AWS, Google, Groq), Agent Infrastructure Control Plane (per-agent GPU cost, budget enforcement, model policies, dependency graph), governance (AI Act, SOC 2, immutable HMAC audit chain), and GPU FinOps (chargeback, waste..)..7418MIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to manage GPU training end-to-end through natural language, including submitting and scheduling jobs, monitoring logs and metrics, diagnosing failures, comparing runs, and recommending the best checkpoints.Apache 2.0

Mirador MCPofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to perform observability analysis across Prometheus-compatible metrics and logs without prior vendor knowledge, including signal discovery, entity topology resolution, root-cause analysis, correlation, and capacity forecasting through natural-language anchors.Apache 2.0- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables users to investigate infrastructure incidents in plain English, correlate observability and deploy data with runbooks, and get evidence-backed root-cause proposals with approval-gated remediation.5-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI-driven incident response by connecting Claude to monitoring tools like Prometheus, Grafana, Loki, PagerDuty, and Slack for automated investigation and runbook generation.9-
TDQS
Scored across 39 tools
Several tools are near-duplicates differentiated only by engine-specificity: request_metrics vs engine_request_metrics, queue_depth vs engine_queue_depth, and diagnose_latency_spike vs diagnose_engine_latency. model_list and engine_inventory also overlap in listing served models, making tool selection ambiguous.
Names are consistently snake_case but mix object-first patterns (model_list, deployment_status, engine_health) with action-first verbs (model_deploy, scale_replicas_up, diagnose_latency_spike). Phrasal names like scale_to_zero and undo_apply add further inconsistency, though the naming is still readable and not chaotic.
39 tools is excessive for the domain and the count is inflated by redundant vLLM-specific/engine-agnostic pairs and three refuse-with-teaching stubs (replica_restart, routing_policy_update, drain_replica). Many tools could be consolidated, so the set feels bloated rather than well-scoped.
The surface covers model lifecycle, scaling, autoscaling, monitoring, diagnostics, cost, and undo, which is broad for an inference AIops server. However, notable gaps include no in-place deployment config update, no log/event retrieval, no request tracing, and several advertised actions are stubs that refuse to execute.