fabric-aiops
Related Servers
Alternatives to fabric-aiops
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceGoverned OPNsense + pfSense firewall operations — gateway-health, rule-shadow, and blocked-traffic RCA, with guarded rule/alias writes, unbypassable audit logging (MCP + CLI), budget/runaway guards, dry-run, and undo/rollback.35MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceGoverned reverse-proxy operations for Traefik, Caddy, and HAProxy — backend-health, cert-expiry, 5xx, and route-conflict RCA, with unbypassable audit logging (MCP + CLI), budget/runaway guards, dry-run, and undo/rollback.28MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides dynamic access to 400+ Meraki Dashboard API endpoints with intelligent discovery, plus advanced compliance auditing (PCI DSS, HIPAA, SOC2, ISO 27001, NIST), backup/restore operations, and network security analysis. Enables natural language queries to manage Meraki networks without pre-defined tools.4-
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceGoverned Prometheus + Grafana operations — firing-alert and scrape-target RCA, alert noise/flapping analysis, silences, and dashboards, with unbypassable audit logging (MCP + CLI), budget/runaway guards, dry-run, and undo/rollback.39MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceGoverned CI/CD operations for self-hosted GitLab and Gitea — pipeline-failure, runner, artifact-bloat, and stale-branch RCA, with unbypassable audit logging (MCP + CLI), budget/runaway guards, dry-run, and undo/rollback.28MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceGoverns and automates network monitoring across SolarWinds Orion and Paessler PRTG platforms with a unified MCP server, enabling querying, alert management, and governed writes with audit logging.42MIT
TDQS
Scored across 34 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose, targeting different resources (clients, devices, networks, org) or different aspects (list/get/usage/connectivity). Even overlapping terms like device_status vs org_device_statuses are differentiated by scope and description.
Most tools follow a verb_noun pattern (e.g., client_get, device_inventory, reboot_device). However, some deviate (client_connectivity, network_health_score, uplink_loss_and_latency_rca) or use long phrases, but overall the naming is readable and predictable.
34 tools is high for a typical MCP server, covering many read and write operations. While each tool has a distinct role, the sheer number may overwhelm agents. It is borderline but not extreme.
The tool set heavily favors read operations (20+ reads) with limited writes (reboot, blink, update device/VLAN, claim/remove, bind/unbind). Missing create/delete for networks and VLANs, write access for SSIDs, switch ports, or other common configuration tasks. Significant gaps hinder full lifecycle management.