Skip to main content
Glama
AIops-tools

fabric-aiops

Related Servers

Alternatives to fabric-aiops

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Governed OPNsense + pfSense firewall operations — gateway-health, rule-shadow, and blocked-traffic RCA, with guarded rule/alias writes, unbypassable audit logging (MCP + CLI), budget/runaway guards, dry-run, and undo/rollback.
      35
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Governed reverse-proxy operations for Traefik, Caddy, and HAProxy — backend-health, cert-expiry, 5xx, and route-conflict RCA, with unbypassable audit logging (MCP + CLI), budget/runaway guards, dry-run, and undo/rollback.
      28
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides dynamic access to 400+ Meraki Dashboard API endpoints with intelligent discovery, plus advanced compliance auditing (PCI DSS, HIPAA, SOC2, ISO 27001, NIST), backup/restore operations, and network security analysis. Enables natural language queries to manage Meraki networks without pre-defined tools.
      4
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Governed Prometheus + Grafana operations — firing-alert and scrape-target RCA, alert noise/flapping analysis, silences, and dashboards, with unbypassable audit logging (MCP + CLI), budget/runaway guards, dry-run, and undo/rollback.
      39
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Governed CI/CD operations for self-hosted GitLab and Gitea — pipeline-failure, runner, artifact-bloat, and stale-branch RCA, with unbypassable audit logging (MCP + CLI), budget/runaway guards, dry-run, and undo/rollback.
      28
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Governs and automates network monitoring across SolarWinds Orion and Paessler PRTG platforms with a unified MCP server, enabling querying, alert management, and governed writes with audit logging.
      42
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 34 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose, targeting different resources (clients, devices, networks, org) or different aspects (list/get/usage/connectivity). Even overlapping terms like device_status vs org_device_statuses are differentiated by scope and description.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a verb_noun pattern (e.g., client_get, device_inventory, reboot_device). However, some deviate (client_connectivity, network_health_score, uplink_loss_and_latency_rca) or use long phrases, but overall the naming is readable and predictable.

    Tool Count3/5

    34 tools is high for a typical MCP server, covering many read and write operations. While each tool has a distinct role, the sheer number may overwhelm agents. It is borderline but not extreme.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool set heavily favors read operations (20+ reads) with limited writes (reboot, blink, update device/VLAN, claim/remove, bind/unbind). Missing create/delete for networks and VLANs, write access for SSIDs, switch ports, or other common configuration tasks. Significant gaps hinder full lifecycle management.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues