Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
compliance-aiops

compliance-aiops

by AIops-tools
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to compliance-aiops

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • PiQrypt MCP Server

      PiQrypt
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to sign decisions with post-quantum cryptographic proofs and maintain secure audit trails for compliance. It provides tools for stamping events, verifying chain integrity, and exporting audit data across industries like finance and healthcare.
      4
      73 npm
      MIT

    • mcp-security-compliance

      an0malous
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Integrates authoritative security compliance frameworks (ISO 27001, NIST 800-53, OWASP ASVS, NIST SSDF) into AI-assisted development, offering control lookups, cross-framework mappings, build-time guardrails, and automated audit evidence generation.
      696 npm
      3
      MIT

    • Kanonik

      Kanonik-LLC
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides a typed compliance model and governance runtime that lets AI draft policies, assess controls, find framework gaps, and build verifiable audit trails across frameworks like ISO 27001:2022, SOC 2, GDPR, NIST CSF 2.0, and HIPAA. Every write is gated by a server-side verifier and human approval, producing a tamper-evident record.
      Apache 2.0

    • TrustAtom MCP Server

      CWNApps
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides cryptographic signing and verification for AI decisions to generate verifiable, Ed25519-signed receipts for compliance and auditing. It automatically maps AI actions to regulatory frameworks like HIPAA and SOX with high-performance, sub-3ms signing.
      4
      MIT

    • Iron Cannon

      DillonRich
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP-powered compliance copilot for SaaS stacks, enabling structured audit workflows including stack detection, module wiremapping, implementation directives, code verification, and security/infrastructure/legal readiness gates.
      AGPL 3.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 19 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target clearly distinct objects/actions (evidence bundles, audit chains, reports, undo tokens), and descriptions cross-reference each other well. Minor overlaps remain: export_bundle(fmt=oscal) vs oscal_assessment_results both produce OSCAL from a bundle, and coverage_summary vs gap_analysis are complementary per-framework views that could be confused at a glance.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names use consistent snake_case with readable, domain-specific terms. Verb style is mixed (sign_bundle, verify_bundle vs coverage_summary, gap_analysis, approval_report) and a few are noun phrases, but the convention is never chaotic.

    Tool Count4/5

    19 tools is slightly above the typical well-scoped band, but the domain is broad (bundle lifecycle, audit querying, verification, reporting, undo, scheduling) and each tool maps to a distinct capability. Nothing looks like filler.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the core lifecycle: generate, sign, verify, export (markdown/csv/json/OSCAL), list, coverage/control/gap analysis, audit query, chain verification, approval/exceptions reports, and undo list/apply. Gaps are minor — no bundle retrieval-by-id, retention/prune, or bundle diff/compare operations.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues

    Resources