Skip to main content
Glama
AIops-tools

io.github.AIops-tools/ceph-aiops

by AIops-tools
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to io.github.AIops-tools/ceph-aiops

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • truenas-aiops

      AIops-tools
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      AI-powered MCP server for TrueNAS SCALE storage operations with governance and safety features, enabling management of pools, datasets, snapshots, disks, alerts, and services.
      25
      MIT

    • observability-aiops

      AIops-tools
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Governed Prometheus + Grafana operations — firing-alert and scrape-target RCA, alert noise/flapping analysis, silences, and dashboards, with unbypassable audit logging (MCP + CLI), budget/runaway guards, dry-run, and undo/rollback.
      39
      MIT

    • Ceph MCP Server

      rajmohanram
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that enables AI assistants to interact with Ceph storage clusters through natural language, making storage management more accessible and intuitive.
      6
      MIT

    • cicd-aiops

      AIops-tools
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Governed CI/CD operations for self-hosted GitLab and Gitea — pipeline-failure, runner, artifact-bloat, and stale-branch RCA, with unbypassable audit logging (MCP + CLI), budget/runaway guards, dry-run, and undo/rollback.
      28
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 37 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Every tool targets a distinct resource-action pair: OSD, pool, PG, RBD, monitor, manager, RGW, CephFS, and undo state are cleanly separated. Even the read-only status tools are differentiated by resource (cluster vs pool vs OSD vs PG) and by metric (utilization, health, latency, scrub state).

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Names consistently follow a verb_noun snake_case pattern: set_pool_size, osd_mark_out, trigger_scrub, rbd_snapshot_delete. Resource prefixes like osd_, pool_, rbd_, pg_, and cluster_ create a predictable grouping with no mixed casing or vague verbs.

    Tool Count2/5

    At 37 tools, the surface is well beyond the 25+ threshold and will require an agent to navigate a large option space. Ceph is a broad domain and each tool is distinct, but the count is still heavy enough to hurt selection efficiency and readability.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers the core Ceph operations loop well: health triage, OSD lifecycle, pool configuration, PG state, scrub triggers, RBD snapshots, recovery throttling, and an undo system. Minor gaps exist—such as RBD resize, RGW bucket management, CephFS volume creation, and OSD addition—but the main troubleshooting and remediation workflows are complete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityNo data
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources