Skip to main content
Glama
AIops-tools

io.github.AIops-tools/ceph-aiops

by AIops-tools
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to io.github.AIops-tools/ceph-aiops

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • truenas-aiops

      AIops-tools
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      AI-powered MCP server for TrueNAS SCALE storage operations with governance and safety features, enabling management of pools, datasets, snapshots, disks, alerts, and services.
      25
      MIT

    • observability-aiops

      AIops-tools
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Governed Prometheus + Grafana operations — firing-alert and scrape-target RCA, alert noise/flapping analysis, silences, and dashboards, with unbypassable audit logging (MCP + CLI), budget/runaway guards, dry-run, and undo/rollback.
      39
      MIT

    • Ceph MCP Server

      rajmohanram
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that enables AI assistants to interact with Ceph storage clusters through natural language, making storage management more accessible and intuitive.
      6
      MIT

    • cicd-aiops

      AIops-tools
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Governed CI/CD operations for self-hosted GitLab and Gitea — pipeline-failure, runner, artifact-bloat, and stale-branch RCA, with unbypassable audit logging (MCP + CLI), budget/runaway guards, dry-run, and undo/rollback.
      28
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 37 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target clearly distinct resources and actions (mon vs mgr vs osd vs pg vs pool vs rbd), and descriptions reinforce the boundaries. A few pairs are close enough to risk confusion: cluster_health vs cluster_status, pool_ls vs pool_df, and pg_summary vs pg_dump_stuck, but the prose distinguishes them well.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Everything is snake_case and consistently resource-prefixed (osd_, pool_, pg_, rbd_, cluster_, cephfs_, rgw_, mon_, mgr_, undo_), which makes grouping very readable. Verb placement varies though: set_pool_quota/set_pool_size are verb-first while pool_create/pool_delete and osd_mark_out are noun/action-first, a minor but real deviation.

    Tool Count3/5

    37 tools is well past the 'heavy' threshold, and while the Ceph domain genuinely spans cluster, mon, mgr, osd, pg, pool, rbd, cephfs, rgw, and an undo subsystem, the surface still feels broad. Each tool maps to a distinct operation so little is truly wasted, but the count is on the bloated side for the observable scope.

    Completeness4/5

    Coverage is strong for an AIOps server: rich read diagnostics plus write/remediation for pools, OSDs, RBD, scrubs, throttle, cluster flags, and a reversible-undo pattern. Gaps remain — no CephFS provisioning, no RGW user/bucket management, no RBD resize/clone/flatten, no OSD add or CRUSH editing — but these are minor for a monitoring-and-remediation focus.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources