email_delete
Delete specified emails from a folder by moving them to Trash. Provide UIDs to remove unwanted messages.
Instructions
Delete emails by moving them to Trash
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| uids | Yes | ||
| folder | No | INBOX |
Delete specified emails from a folder by moving them to Trash. Provide UIDs to remove unwanted messages.
Delete emails by moving them to Trash
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| uids | Yes | ||
| folder | No | INBOX |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries full burden. It mentions moving to Trash but does not disclose side effects (e.g., recoverability, permission requirements, or behavior when folder is specified).
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence is concise but under-specified. Could be improved by adding param details while remaining brief.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given 2 parameters and no output schema, the description lacks details on return values, error handling, and the role of the folder parameter.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description adds no explanation for parameters (uids, folder). It does not specify that uids are email identifiers or that folder is the source folder.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states the action: delete emails by moving them to Trash. This distinguishes from siblings like email_move (which moves to arbitrary folders) and implies it's not permanent deletion.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidelines on when to use this tool vs alternatives (e.g., email_move for moving to a specific folder, or a permanent delete tool if exists). No when-not or prerequisite conditions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/AIWerk/mcp-server-imap'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server