Skip to main content
Glama
AIStoryHub

Étincel MCP Server

by AIStoryHub
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to Étincel MCP Server

  • Writing Tools MCP Server

    wdm0006
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    MCP server offering text analysis tools for writing improvement, including spellcheck, readability, keyword analysis, passive voice detection, and AI-generated content detection.
    10
    MIT

  • mcp-ai-slop-checker

    parweb
    A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Three deterministic MCP tools that score text for AI-writing tells (em-dash density, hedge words, tricolons, boilerplate openers) and grade landing-page copy. No LLM, no network calls, no API key — same input always yields the same score. Published on the official MCP registry as io.github.parweb/ai-slop-checker.
    3
    MIT

Related Servers

  • ScriptGrain MCP

    StovBuilds
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Allows AI assistants to measure your writing style across 45 attributes, create a voice profile from your samples, generate drafts matching that voice, and score any text for voice consistency.
    MIT

  • dsh-novel-writer

    siweina
    A
    license
    B
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Local-first toolkit with 16 tools for Chinese web-novel (网文) authors: style baselines, foreshadowing and plot-thread tracking, continuity & OOC audits, keyword and sentence-pattern analysis, and offline semantic search. No API key, no network — everything runs on your machine.
    2
    19
    986 npm
    22
    MIT

  • content-qa-mcp

    Alvi-808
    A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables editorial content QA over the Model Context Protocol with four local tools that analyze readability, AI-sounding language, SEO on-page factors, and produce full reports where every finding includes an actionable fix.
    4
    1
    MIT

  • stil-lint

    fredrsat
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables automated agents and writers to check Norwegian and English prose before sending, returning concrete style findings, revision hints, and verdicts instead of authorship claims, with a no-judgment band, positive quality checks, a private local mode, and phrase-bank memory.
    MIT

  • write-like-me-mcp

    gwicho38
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables Claude to write in your personal style by learning from your local documents. It provides statistical style context for natural language rewriting, all without any data leaving your machine.
    MIT

  • being-human

    Syedomershah99
    A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    MCP server that analyzes your writing style to generate personal voice rules, scores drafts for AI slop, and verifies authorship, enabling LLMs to write in your specific voice.
    7
    MIT
Deploy Server
Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

TDQS

A4.4/5.0

Scored across 19 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a distinct resource and action: style lifecycle (list, get, create, update, delete, fork), voice checking (match, self-repetition), text auditing, dictionary management, and instructions. Even similar-sounding pairs like get_style_guide vs get_style_instructions are clearly differentiated by their descriptions.

Naming Consistency5/5

All 19 tools follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (list_styles, train_style, create_style_from_dials, check_voice_match, add_banned_word, etc.). There is no mixing of camelCase or inconsistent verb styles.

Tool Count4/5

With 19 tools, the set is on the heavier side but each tool serves a clear purpose within the server's broad scope of style management, auditing, and dictionary maintenance. The count is slightly over the ideal 3-15 range but still well-organized and justified.

Completeness5/5

The surface provides full lifecycle coverage for styles (create via samples or dials, read, update, delete, fork, list, set default), plus text quality checks (AI tells, voice match, self-repetition), word-list management, and instructions. There are no significant dead ends or missing core operations; the server intentionally does not generate prose directly.

Maintenance

ActivitySlowing
ResponsivenessUnresponsive

Resources