@aiorouter/mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to @aiorouter/mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides access to 400+ AI models via OpenRouter, enabling chat, comparison, and document analysis through Claude.518 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that routes AI chat requests to the best available provider (Anthropic, OpenAI, Groq, etc.) with automatic fallback, budget caps, and model-tier routing.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI applications to access 20+ model providers (including OpenAI, Anthropic, Google) through a unified interface for text and image generation.230MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that retrieves and provides AI model information from OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google through a unified interface.322 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides AI agents free access to NVIDIA's hosted AI models (100+ models) with automatic model routing for tasks like reasoning, coding, vision, embeddings, and translation.102MIT
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceMCP server that provides AI assistants with real-time, current information about AI models from OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google, including pricing, capabilities, and context windows.4MIT
TDQS
Scored across 10 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource or action: chat, model listing, model details, comparison, pricing, cost estimation, usage, connection test, config export, and presets. While list_models and get_model_info both relate to models, the former enumerates models while the latter provides detailed info for a single model, making the distinction clear. The descriptions reinforce these boundaries.
All tools follow a consistent aiorouter_ prefix with a verb_noun pattern: chat, list_models, get_usage, get_pricing, export_config, compare_models, etc. Naming is uniform, snake_case, and verbs align with the operation. No mixed conventions or vague verbs like 'do_thing'.
With 10 tools, the server is well-scoped for an AI router service. Each tool earns its place by covering distinct user needs: interaction, exploration, cost management, and configuration. This is within the ideal 3-15 range and neither feels sparse nor overwhelming.
The surface covers the core domain comprehensively: chat completions, model discovery (list, get, compare), pricing and cost estimation, account usage, connection validation, and configuration export. No obvious dead ends or missing essential operations for the stated purpose of interacting with AIOrouter. The only noted limitation (non-streaming) is a technical constraint, not a tool gap.