AIM-Guard-MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to AIM-Guard-MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides safeguard capabilities to protect against prompt injection and unsafe tool calls.763 PyPI9MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA protected Model Context Protocol server that gives AI agents distinct machine identities, enforces least-privilege OAuth permissions, applies contextual authorization policies, and pauses sensitive actions for human approval.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that provides tools to scan text and URLs for prompt injection attacks, protecting AI agents from adversarial inputs.MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that allows secure execution of pre-approved commands, enabling AI assistants to safely interact with the user's system.12 npm22ISC
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that lets AI agents and runtime firewalls call PromptShield-style safety checks for text, chat messages, prompts, tool inputs, and generated outputs.41MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that provides a security gateway for AI agents, enforcing allow/confirm/deny policies on tool calls and requiring human approval for risky operations, with full audit logging.-
TDQS
Scored across 6 tools
Each tool targets a specific security concern: prompt enhancement, text guard, safety instructions, credential scanning, injection detection, and URL validation. There is no overlap in their purposes.
All tool names use snake_case and are noun phrases, but some have an 'aim-' prefix while others do not (e.g., 'credential-scanner' vs. 'aim-security-prompt-tool'). This minor inconsistency prevents a perfect score.
Six tools is an appropriate number for a security-focused server. Each tool addresses a distinct aspect of AI safety without redundancy or unnecessary complexity.
The tools cover major security areas: prompt injection, credential leaks, URL safety, and general AI safety. Missing a tool for data leakage beyond credentials, but overall coverage is solid for the domain.