Skip to main content
Glama
AIM-Intelligence

AIM-Guard-MCP

Related Servers

Alternatives to AIM-Guard-MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A protected Model Context Protocol server that gives AI agents distinct machine identities, enforces least-privilege OAuth permissions, applies contextual authorization policies, and pauses sensitive actions for human approval.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides tools to scan text and URLs for prompt injection attacks, protecting AI agents from adversarial inputs.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that lets AI agents and runtime firewalls call PromptShield-style safety checks for text, chat messages, prompts, tool inputs, and generated outputs.
      4
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides a security gateway for AI agents, enforcing allow/confirm/deny policies on tool calls and requiring human approval for risky operations, with full audit logging.
      -

    TDQS

    C2.9/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a specific security concern: prompt enhancement, text guard, safety instructions, credential scanning, injection detection, and URL validation. There is no overlap in their purposes.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tool names use snake_case and are noun phrases, but some have an 'aim-' prefix while others do not (e.g., 'credential-scanner' vs. 'aim-security-prompt-tool'). This minor inconsistency prevents a perfect score.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is an appropriate number for a security-focused server. Each tool addresses a distinct aspect of AI safety without redundancy or unnecessary complexity.

    Completeness4/5

    The tools cover major security areas: prompt injection, credential leaks, URL safety, and general AI safety. Missing a tool for data leakage beyond credentials, but overall coverage is solid for the domain.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues