Skip to main content
Glama
Riksarkivet MCP Server

Riksarkivet MCP Server

Related Servers

Alternatives to Riksarkivet MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to conduct Swedish genealogy research using the Swedish National Archives' public APIs, from identifying parishes and locating digitised church books to fetching and reading scanned pages with source citations.
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to search and retrieve historical materials from five public archives in a unified format, including full-text search inside scanned books, rights statements, and provenance-tracked media downloads.
      23
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables searching and retrieving historical Swedish portraits, biographies, and printed source references from Svenskt Porträttarkiv, including direct image links and genealogical citations.
      3
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides access to Sweden's National Library (Kungliga biblioteket) open APIs, enabling search and retrieval of 20M+ bibliographic records, 10M+ cultural heritage objects, 2M+ research publications, and linked data through 52 tools across 10 endpoints.
      3
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables full-text search and retrieval of Kansallisarkisto's machine-transcribed archival corpora, including medieval charters from Diplomatarium Fennicum, with filters and stemming support.
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: 'search_transcribed' is for discovering documents via keyword searches, while 'browse_document' is for retrieving full transcriptions of specific pages. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them; each serves a different stage in the document exploration workflow.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun naming pattern ('search_transcribed' and 'browse_document'), using snake_case throughout. The verbs 'search' and 'browse' accurately reflect their distinct functions, and the pattern is uniform across the tool set.

    Tool Count2/5

    With only two tools, the server feels under-scoped for its domain of historical document exploration. While the tools cover search and viewing, there are likely missing operations such as filtering by metadata, listing document collections, or handling user sessions. A typical server in this domain would benefit from 5-10 tools for a more complete surface.

    Completeness3/5

    The server provides core search and browse functionality, but there are notable gaps. It lacks tools for document metadata retrieval, collection browsing, or advanced filtering beyond keyword search. Agents can work around this by using the existing tools iteratively, but the surface is incomplete for comprehensive historical research workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityNo data
    ResponsivenessSyncing