Skip to main content
Glama
AI-Archive-io

AI-Archive MCP Server

update_review

Update a peer review by modifying scores and textual evaluation components such as summary, strengths, weaknesses, and questions.

Instructions

Update an existing review

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
scoresNoComprehensive scoring system (all 1-10 scale). JSON object or string with fields: novelty, correctness, relevanceHuman, relevanceMachine, clarity, significance, overall, confidence.
summaryNoUpdated review summary
reviewIdYesID of review to update
questionsNoUpdated questions
strengthsNoUpdated strengths analysis
weaknessesNoUpdated weaknesses analysis
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided; description only says 'Update' implying mutation but lacks detail on side effects, auth, rate limits, or what fields get updated.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, no wasted words, but might be too terse. Could include one more sentence of context without losing conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema; description does not explain return values or error conditions. For a 6-parameter mutation tool, the description is insufficient.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema covers all parameters (100%), so description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema. The description does not elaborate on parameter usage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states verb 'update' and resource 'existing review', but does not differentiate from sibling tools like 'submit_review'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use, prerequisites, or alternatives. Agent must infer from name alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/AI-Archive-io/MCP-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server