Skip to main content
Glama
AGICoffe

my-topology-engine

by AGICoffe
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to my-topology-engine

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • mcp-think

      luna-agente
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A remote MCP server for structured sequential thinking, enabling users to create, revise, and manage sequences of steps with persistent state via Cloudflare Workers and Durable Objects.
      Apache 2.0

    • sakutto-mcp-server

      SakuttoWorks
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      A production-ready MCP server for AI agents, providing deep web research and RAG capabilities via Cloudflare Workers.
      -

    • super-plumber

      LUKAWI
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for managing workflow topology graphs as pure YAML files, enabling AI agents to read, create, claim, and update task nodes with a strict state machine.
      247 npm
      3
      MIT

    • FlowMCP

      PeterGreenAppliedAI
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that exposes deterministic workflows as tools, allowing small models to reliably orchestrate APIs and other MCP servers with minimal parameters.
      2
      21 npm
      2
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion between different tools. The tool's purpose is clearly described as executing a topology engine, leaving no ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The single tool name follows a clear verb_noun pattern ('execute_topology_engine'), which is consistent and predictable. Even with one tool, the naming is well-structured and aligns with common conventions.

    Tool Count3/5

    One tool is on the borderline of being insufficient for a typical server, as most servers require at least a few tools to cover related operations. However, if the server's sole purpose is to run this engine, the count could be justified, but it feels thin without additional context.

    Completeness2/5

    The server exposes only a single operation, lacking any configuration, query, or retrieval tools that would complement the execution workflow. This creates significant gaps for agents that may need to set up inputs or inspect outputs, making the surface incomplete for a broader task lifecycle.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources