Google Search Console MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to Google Search Console MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for Google Search Console, enabling querying search analytics, URL inspection, sitemap management, and more via natural language.351 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that exposes the Google Search Console API, allowing LLMs to query SEO data, inspect URLs, manage sitemaps, and analyze search performance via natural language.66 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for Google Search Console, enabling chat-based queries about search performance, sitemaps, and URL indexing status via natural language.791 npm2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceThis MCP server provides LLMs with programmatic access to Google Search Console data and functionality, including search analytics, sitemap management, site management, and URL inspection.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for Google Search Console, enabling querying search performance, listing properties, and inspecting URL indexing status from MCP-compatible clients.411 npm1MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP Server that provides access to Google's Search Console API, allowing users to interact with website search performance data and manage search presence through natural language.-
TDQS
Scored across 12 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource and action: site CRUD, sitemap CRUD, analytics query, a convenience wrapper for top queries, URL inspection, and a raw escape hatch. The only potential overlap (search_analytics vs get_top_queries) is explicitly documented as a convenience wrapper, making selection unambiguous.
Most tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., list_sites, add_site, delete_sitemap, inspect_url), but 'search_analytics' and 'raw_request' deviate from that pattern. The naming remains predictable and readable overall.
With 12 tools, the set is well-scoped for the Search Console API, covering site management, sitemap management, analytics, URL inspection, and a fallback request tool. This is within the ideal range and each tool earns its place.
The tool set provides full lifecycle coverage for sites and sitemaps (list/get/add/delete, list/get/submit/delete), offers both raw analytics and a convenience wrapper for top queries, includes URL inspection, and provides a raw_request escape hatch for any uncovered endpoints. No major gaps exist.