Skip to main content
Glama
A1-x-Tech

A1 Gmail MCP

Related Servers

Alternatives to A1 Gmail MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to manage Gmail through natural language, including sending, reading, searching, labeling emails, managing attachments, and performing thread operations.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to manage Gmail through natural language interactions, including sending, reading, searching emails, and managing labels with auto authentication support.
      13,749 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to manage Gmail through natural language interactions with auto-authentication, including sending, reading, searching, and organizing emails and labels.
      13,749 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to manage Gmail emails, including sending, searching, and organizing with labels and attachments via OAuth2.
      47 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to send, read, list, and reply to emails via the Gmail API.
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 18 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource-action pair: message-level and thread-level operations are cleanly separated, direct send vs. draft send are clearly differentiated, and modify_message/manage_trash/list_labels/manage_labels have explicit scopes. The only near-overlap, list_messages vs. list_threads, is resolved by descriptions that tell agents when to use each. No two tools are likely to be confused.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The naming is overwhelmingly verb_noun and snake_case: list_messages, get_thread, create_draft, send_draft, delete_draft, and so on. The minor deviation is raw_request, which is a noun phrase rather than a verb_noun action. Overall the pattern is very predictable.

    Tool Count4/5

    18 tools is on the heavy side, but the count maps cleanly onto the Gmail domain: message, thread, draft, label, profile, and raw escape-hatch groups. Each tool covers a distinct operation, so the size feels comprehensive rather than bloated. It is slightly above the ideal range but still well-scoped.

    Completeness5/5

    The surface covers the full Gmail lifecycle: search/read/send/modify/trash for messages, conversation-level thread operations, draft CRUD plus send, label management, and profile info. The only missing operations, permanent delete and attachment download, are intentionally omitted for safety or covered through raw_request. There are no dead ends for common email workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues