structuredArgumentation
Analyze complex arguments by breaking them into claims, premises, and conclusions. Track relationships between arguments, evaluate strengths and weaknesses, and facilitate dialectical progression through thesis-antithesis-synthesis structures.
Instructions
A detailed tool for systematic dialectical reasoning and argument analysis. This tool helps analyze complex questions through formal argumentation structures. It facilitates the creation, critique, and synthesis of competing arguments.
When to use this tool:
Evaluating competing perspectives and claims
Analyzing complex ethical dilemmas
Assessing policy proposals with multiple stakeholders
Exploring scientific hypotheses and counter-arguments
Key features:
Break down arguments into claims, premises, and conclusions
Track relationships between arguments
Represent objections and rebuttals
Facilitate dialectical progression through thesis-antithesis-synthesis
Evaluate argument strengths and weaknesses
Visualize argument structures
Parameters explained:
claim: The central proposition being argued
premises: Supporting evidence or assumptions
conclusion: The logical consequence of accepting the claim
argumentType: Whether this is a thesis, antithesis, synthesis, objection, or rebuttal
confidence: Your confidence level in this argument (0.0-1.0)
respondsTo: ID of an argument this directly responds to
supports/contradicts: IDs of arguments this supports or contradicts
strengths/weaknesses: Notable strong or weak points of the argument
nextArgumentNeeded: Whether another argument is needed in the dialectic
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| claim | Yes | ||
| premises | Yes | ||
| conclusion | Yes | ||
| argumentId | No | ||
| argumentType | Yes | ||
| confidence | Yes | ||
| respondsTo | No | ||
| supports | No | ||
| contradicts | No | ||
| strengths | No | ||
| weaknesses | No | ||
| nextArgumentNeeded | Yes | ||
| suggestedNextTypes | No |