[
{
"id": "case_2025_alt_bundestag",
"title": "Darf der alte Bundestag nach der Auflösung noch Grundgesetzänderungen beraten?",
"query": "Darf der alte Bundestag nach einer Wahl und seiner Auflösung durch den Bundespräsidenten noch zusammentreten, um Grundgesetzänderungen zu beschließen?",
"expected_case_reference": {
"ecli": "ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2025:es20250313.2bve000525",
"court": "Bundesverfassungsgericht",
"decision_date": "2025-03-13",
"case_number": "2 BvE 3/25",
"title": "Alt-Bundestag I"
},
"expected_summary": "Das Bundesverfassungsgericht stellte klar, dass es kein verfassungsmäßiges Recht gibt, das eine erneute Einberufung des alten Bundestages nach Auflösung grundsätzlich verbietet.",
"relevant_norms": [
"Art. 38 Abs. 1 Satz 2 GG",
"Art. 39 Abs. 3 GG",
"Art. 68 GG"
],
"evaluation_criteria": [
"Findet BVerfG, 2 BvE 3/25",
"Demokratieprinzip korrekt eingeordnet",
"Tenor oder Gründe korrekt paraphrasiert"
],
"description": "Prüft verfassungsrechtliche Abgrenzung zwischen altem und neuem Bundestag und Legitimität nach Auflösung.",
"difficulty": "high",
"tags": [
"verfassungsrecht",
"bundestag",
"organklage"
]
},
{
"id": "case_dashcam",
"title": "Zulässigkeit von Dashcam-Aufnahmen im Zivilprozess",
"query": "Sind Dashcam-Aufnahmen als Beweismittel in einem Zivilprozess erlaubt?",
"expected_case_reference": {
"ecli": "ECLI:DE:BGH:2018:150518UVIIZR233.17.0",
"court": "Bundesgerichtshof",
"decision_date": "2018-05-15",
"case_number": "VI ZR 233/17",
"title": "Dashcam-Entscheidung"
},
"expected_summary": "Dashcam-Aufnahmen dürfen im Zivilprozess verwendet werden, trotz datenschutzrechtlicher Bedenken.",
"relevant_norms": [
"Art. 2 Abs. 1 GG",
"§ 6 BDSG a.F.",
"DSGVO (analog)"
],
"evaluation_criteria": [
"Findet BGH VI ZR 233/17",
"Benennung als zulässig trotz Datenschutz",
"Abwägung Persönlichkeitsrecht vs. Beweisinteresse"
],
"description": "Klassischer Fall zur Kollision von Datenschutz und Beweisführung im Zivilrecht.",
"difficulty": "medium",
"tags": [
"zivilrecht",
"datenschutz",
"beweisrecht"
]
},
{
"id": "case_schimmel_mietrecht",
"title": "Beweislast bei Schimmel in Mietwohnungen",
"query": "Wer muss beweisen, ob Schimmel in der Mietwohnung vom Mieter oder vom Gebäude herrührt?",
"expected_case_reference": {
"ecli": "ECLI:DE:BGH:2007:180407UVIIIZR182.06.0",
"court": "Bundesgerichtshof",
"decision_date": "2007-04-18",
"case_number": "VIII ZR 182/06",
"title": "Schimmel und Beweislast"
},
"expected_summary": "Grundsätzlich muss der Vermieter beweisen, dass der Mieter für Schimmelbildung verantwortlich ist.",
"relevant_norms": [
"§ 535 BGB",
"§ 280 BGB"
],
"evaluation_criteria": [
"Findet BGH VIII ZR 182/06",
"Benennung der Beweislastverteilung korrekt",
"Zusammenhang mit Mietmangel richtig dargestellt"
],
"description": "Testet tenant-landlord logic und differenzierte Beweislastverteilung im Mietrecht.",
"difficulty": "medium",
"tags": [
"mietrecht",
"beweislast",
"zivilrecht"
]
},
{
"id": "case_kopftuchverbot",
"title": "Kopftuchverbot für Lehrerinnen im öffentlichen Schuldienst",
"query": "Darf ein Bundesland Lehrerinnen das Tragen eines Kopftuchs verbieten?",
"expected_case_reference": {
"ecli": "ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2015:rs20150127.1bvr0471.10",
"court": "Bundesverfassungsgericht",
"decision_date": "2015-01-27",
"case_number": "1 BvR 471/10",
"title": "Kopftuch-Entscheidung"
},
"expected_summary": "Ein pauschales Kopftuchverbot ist verfassungswidrig, es bedarf konkreter Gefährdung des Schulfriedens.",
"relevant_norms": [
"Art. 4 Abs. 1 und 2 GG",
"Art. 33 Abs. 3 GG"
],
"evaluation_criteria": [
"Findet BVerfG 1 BvR 471/10",
"Erkenntnis: Pauschalverbot unzulässig",
"Religionsfreiheit korrekt dargestellt"
],
"description": "Testet Fähigkeit, Grundrechte im Kontext des öffentlichen Dienstes korrekt zu interpretieren.",
"difficulty": "medium",
"tags": [
"religionsfreiheit",
"schulrecht",
"grundrechte"
]
},
{
"id": "case_buergergeld_sanktionen",
"title": "Sanktionen bei Bürgergeld/Hartz IV-Leistungen",
"query": "Dürfen bei Pflichtverstößen Leistungen beim Bürgergeld vollständig gestrichen werden?",
"expected_case_reference": {
"ecli": "ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2019:rs20191105.1bvl000716",
"court": "Bundesverfassungsgericht",
"decision_date": "2019-11-05",
"case_number": "1 BvL 7/16",
"title": "Sanktionen bei Hartz IV"
},
"expected_summary": "Das BVerfG entschied, dass vollständige Leistungskürzungen gegen das Grundgesetz verstoßen.",
"relevant_norms": [
"Art. 1 Abs. 1 GG",
"Art. 20 Abs. 1 GG",
"SGB II"
],
"evaluation_criteria": [
"Findet BVerfG 1 BvL 7/16",
"Erkennt das Verbot vollständiger Sanktionen",
"Verweist auf Menschenwürde als Grundlage"
],
"description": "Testfall für das Spannungsfeld zwischen Mitwirkungspflicht und Existenzsicherung.",
"difficulty": "medium",
"tags": [
"sozialrecht",
"grundrechte",
"menschenwürde"
]
},
{
"id": "misconception_rental_law",
"title": "Rental Law Misconception - § 535 vs § 558 BGB",
"query": "BGB § 535 Mieterhöhungsantrag",
"expected_summary": "The system should correct the misconception that § 535 BGB covers rent increases, redirecting to § 558 BGB which actually governs rent increases.",
"relevant_norms": [
"§ 535 BGB",
"§ 558 BGB"
],
"evaluation_criteria": [
"Identifies misconception about § 535 BGB",
"Correctly redirects to § 558 BGB for rent increases",
"Mentions Mieterhöhung, Kappungsgrenze, Mietspiegel"
],
"description": "Tests intelligent correction of common rental law misconceptions where users confuse basic rental obligations with rent increase procedures.",
"difficulty": "medium",
"tags": [
"mietrecht",
"misconception-correction",
"bgb",
"semantic-search"
]
},
{
"id": "misconception_employment_law",
"title": "Employment Law Misconception - § 1 KSchG vs Dismissal Procedures",
"query": "§ 1 KSchG Kündigungsschutzantrag",
"expected_summary": "The system should recognize that § 1 KSchG defines the scope of protection, not application procedures, and redirect to actual dismissal protection procedures.",
"relevant_norms": [
"§ 1 KSchG",
"§ 4 KSchG",
"§ 13 KSchG"
],
"evaluation_criteria": [
"Recognizes § 1 KSchG is about scope, not procedures",
"Redirects to Kündigungsschutzklage procedures",
"Mentions § 4 KSchG and court procedures"
],
"description": "Tests correction of employment law misconceptions where users confuse definitional paragraphs with procedural ones.",
"difficulty": "medium",
"tags": [
"arbeitsrecht",
"misconception-correction",
"kschg",
"semantic-search"
]
},
{
"id": "misconception_social_law",
"title": "Social Law Misconception - § 27 vs § 19 SGB XII",
"query": "SGB XII § 27 Sozialhilfeantrag",
"expected_summary": "The system should distinguish between § 27 SGB XII (care benefits) and § 19 SGB XII (general social assistance applications).",
"relevant_norms": [
"§ 27 SGB XII",
"§ 19 SGB XII"
],
"evaluation_criteria": [
"Identifies § 27 SGB XII is about care benefits",
"Correctly redirects to § 19 SGB XII for general applications",
"Mentions Hilfe zum Lebensunterhalt, Grundsicherung"
],
"description": "Tests social law misconception correction where users confuse specific benefit types with general application procedures.",
"difficulty": "medium",
"tags": [
"sozialrecht",
"misconception-correction",
"sgb-xii",
"semantic-search"
]
},
{
"id": "english_employee_rights_restructuring",
"title": "English Query: Employee Rights During Company Restructuring",
"query": "What are the German laws regarding employee rights during company restructuring?",
"expected_summary": "The system should translate English terms to German and find relevant employment law (KSchG, BetrVG) regarding dismissal protection and works council participation during restructuring.",
"relevant_norms": [
"KSchG",
"BetrVG",
"BGB"
],
"evaluation_criteria": [
"Translates English query to German legal terms",
"Finds employment law (Arbeitsrecht) provisions",
"Mentions Kündigungsschutz and Betriebsrat"
],
"description": "Tests English-to-German translation for employment law queries and finds relevant German labor law provisions.",
"difficulty": "medium",
"tags": [
"english-translation",
"arbeitsrecht",
"employment-law",
"semantic-search"
]
},
{
"id": "english_data_protection_search",
"title": "English Query: German Data Protection Laws",
"query": "Search for German laws about data protection from 2018 onwards",
"expected_summary": "The system should translate to German terms and find GDPR/DSGVO and BDSG provisions about data protection.",
"relevant_norms": [
"DSGVO",
"BDSG"
],
"evaluation_criteria": [
"Translates 'data protection' to 'Datenschutz'",
"Finds DSGVO and BDSG references",
"Applies temporal filter for 2018+"
],
"description": "Tests English-to-German translation for data protection queries and temporal filtering.",
"difficulty": "medium",
"tags": [
"english-translation",
"datenschutz",
"data-protection",
"semantic-search"
]
},
{
"id": "english_court_decisions_search",
"title": "English Query: Court Decisions About Trademark",
"query": "Find recent court decisions from the Bundesgerichtshof about trademark infringement",
"expected_summary": "The system should translate trademark terms to German and find BGH decisions about Markenrecht.",
"relevant_norms": [
"MarkenG",
"BGB"
],
"evaluation_criteria": [
"Translates 'trademark' to 'Marke'",
"Finds BGH court decisions",
"Relates to Markenrecht or intellectual property"
],
"description": "Tests English-to-German translation for intellectual property law and court decision searches.",
"difficulty": "medium",
"tags": [
"english-translation",
"markenrecht",
"trademark",
"court-decisions"
]
},
{
"id": "english_semantic_complex",
"title": "English Query: Complex Semantic Search",
"query": "What are the German laws regarding employee rights during company restructuring?",
"expected_summary": "The system should provide comprehensive translation and semantic mapping for complex employment law query.",
"relevant_norms": [
"KSchG",
"BetrVG",
"BGB"
],
"evaluation_criteria": [
"Shows translation from English to German",
"Maps to Kündigungsschutz, Betriebsrat concepts",
"Finds relevant employment law provisions"
],
"description": "Tests comprehensive English-to-German semantic search with complex legal concepts.",
"difficulty": "high",
"tags": [
"english-translation",
"semantic-search",
"complex-query",
"employment-law"
]
},
{
"id": "gg_article_1",
"title": "Grundgesetz Artikel 1 - Menschenwürde",
"query": "Wie lautet der Artikel 1 des Grundgesetzes?",
"expected_law": "GG",
"relevant_norms": [
"Art. 1 GG"
],
"evaluation_criteria": [
"Finds Grundgesetz für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland",
"Returns text of Article 1",
"URL is human-readable markdown link with document name"
],
"description": "Tests basic law lookup by article number - very common use case.",
"difficulty": "easy",
"tags": [
"grundgesetz",
"article-lookup",
"constitutional-law"
]
},
{
"id": "sgb_i_lookup",
"title": "SGB I Direktzugriff per Abkürzung",
"query": "Finde mir das Gesetz SGB I",
"expected_law": "SGB I",
"relevant_norms": [
"SGB I"
],
"expected_abbreviation": "SGB I",
"should_not_return": "VersMedV",
"evaluation_criteria": [
"Returns Sozialgesetzbuch Erstes Buch",
"NOT VersMedV or other wrong law",
"Abbreviation matches exactly SGB I",
"URL is human-readable markdown link"
],
"description": "Tests abbreviation search accuracy - critical bug fix validation.",
"difficulty": "medium",
"tags": [
"abbreviation-search",
"sgb",
"bug-validation"
]
},
{
"id": "sgb_collection_search",
"title": "Alle Sozialgesetzbücher finden",
"query": "Bitte suche mir die SGB Gesetze raus",
"expected_law": "SGB",
"relevant_norms": [
"SGB I",
"SGB II",
"SGB III",
"SGB IV",
"SGB V",
"SGB VI"
],
"evaluation_criteria": [
"Finds multiple SGB books (at least 5)",
"Each result has human-readable markdown link",
"Results include various SGB books I-XIV",
"URLs contain document names not just API paths"
],
"description": "Tests finding multiple related laws - validates URL formatting across multiple results.",
"difficulty": "medium",
"tags": [
"sgb",
"multi-document",
"url-validation"
]
},
{
"id": "bgb_abbreviation",
"title": "BGB per Abkürzung finden",
"query": "Zeige mir das BGB",
"expected_law": "BGB",
"relevant_norms": [
"BGB"
],
"expected_abbreviation": "BGB",
"evaluation_criteria": [
"Returns Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch",
"Abbreviation matches exactly BGB",
"URL is markdown link with full law name",
"NOT other laws with BGB in name"
],
"description": "Tests common abbreviation lookup for civil code.",
"difficulty": "easy",
"tags": [
"abbreviation-search",
"bgb",
"civil-law"
]
},
{
"id": "stgb_paragraph_search",
"title": "StGB Paragraphensuche",
"query": "Was regelt § 242 StGB?",
"expected_law": "StGB",
"relevant_norms": [
"§ 242 StGB"
],
"evaluation_criteria": [
"Finds Strafgesetzbuch",
"Identifies § 242 (Diebstahl)",
"Returns content about theft",
"URL is human-readable markdown link"
],
"description": "Tests specific paragraph search in criminal code.",
"difficulty": "medium",
"tags": [
"paragraph-search",
"stgb",
"criminal-law"
]
}
]
