Windows Operations MCP

# Test Execution Summary ## Current Status: September 30, 2025 ### Test Results - **Total Tests**: 139 - **Passing**: 63 (45%) - **Failing**: 76 (55%) - **Coverage**: 2.3% --- ## ✅ Fully Working Test Suites (100% Pass Rate) ### 1. Archive Tools (26/26 passing) ⭐ All tests passing! Comprehensive coverage of: - Format detection (ZIP, TAR, TAR.GZ) - Exclusion patterns - Create/extract/list operations - Roundtrip integrity tests - Error handling ### 2. Decorators (9/9 passing) ⭐ All tests passing! - `@tool` decorator - `@validate_inputs` decorator - `@rate_limited` decorator - `@log_execution` decorator - Validator functions ### 3. Logging Configuration (8/8 passing) ⭐ All tests passing! (86% coverage on logging_config.py) - `get_logger` - `setup_logging` - `RequestContext` - `RequestIdFilter` - Structlog integration ### 4. Initialization Tests (2/2 passing) ⭐ - MCP import - Register all tools import ### 5. Main Module Tests (1/1 passing) ⭐ - Module import test ### 6. File Utils Tests (3/3 passing) ⭐ - `create_temp_file` - `safe_cleanup_file` - `validate_directory` ### 7. Common Utils Tests (1/1 passing) ⭐ - `get_execution_result` ### 8. MCP Server Main Tests (2/2 passing) ⭐ - MCP server creation - Register all tools ### 9. Extended Command Executor Tests (6/10 passing) Passing: - Execute with working directory validation - Execute with error handling - Execute with custom encoding - Execute with timeout - Execute PowerShell with complex command - Execute multiple commands Failing: - Execute with output callback - Execute with large output - Execute with environment variables - Execute with max output size --- ## ❌ Failing Test Suites ### PowerShell Tools (0/26 passing) **Root Cause**: Functions defined inside `register_powershell_tools()`, not directly importable **Status**: Need refactoring to export functions ### Network Tools (0/4 passing) **Root Cause**: Same pattern - functions inside `register_network_tools()` **Status**: Need refactoring ### System Tools (0/6 passing) **Root Cause**: Same pattern - functions inside `register_system_tools()` **Status**: Need refactoring ### Help Tools (0/5 passing) **Root Cause**: Same pattern - functions inside `register_help_tools()` **Status**: Works through MockMCP but fails with direct import ### JSON Tools (0/4 passing) **Root Cause**: Same pattern **Status**: Need refactoring ### Media Tools (0/3 passing) **Root Cause**: Same pattern **Status**: Need refactoring ### Process Tools (0/5 passing) **Root Cause**: Same pattern **Status**: Need refactoring ### Git Tools (0/3 passing) **Root Cause**: Same pattern **Status**: Need refactoring ### Command Executor Tests (0/2 passing) **Root Cause**: Import path issues **Status**: Fix imports ### MCP Server Tests (0/2 passing) **Root Cause**: Tool registration issues **Status**: Depends on fixing tool exports ### MCP Server Detailed Tests (0/10 passing) **Root Cause**: Tool registration issues **Status**: Depends on fixing tool exports ### Integration Tests (0/2 passing) **Root Cause**: Depends on tool registration **Status**: Will pass once tools are fixed --- ## 📊 Coverage Analysis ### High Coverage Modules - `logging_config.py`: **86%** ⭐ - Most other modules: 0% ### Why Coverage is Low 1. **Import Pattern**: Many tests import from modules but don't actually execute the tool functions 2. **Nested Functions**: Tool functions defined inside `register_` functions aren't directly testable 3. **Decorator Wrapping**: `@tool` decorator wraps functions, making direct testing difficult --- ## 🔧 Recommended Fixes (Priority Order) ### Priority 1: Refactor Tool Pattern (HIGH IMPACT) **Problem**: All tool modules use this pattern: ```python def register_xxx_tools(mcp): @mcp.tool() def tool_function(): # implementation ``` **Solution**: Change to: ```python def tool_function(): # implementation def register_xxx_tools(mcp): mcp.tool(tool_function) ``` **Impact**: Will fix 60+ tests immediately **Modules to Refactor**: - `powershell_tools.py` - `network_tools.py` - `system_tools.py` - `help_tools.py` - `process_tools.py` - `media_metadata.py` - `git_tools.py` ### Priority 2: Fix Command Executor Tests (MEDIUM IMPACT) **Problem**: Import path issues **Solution**: Update test imports to match actual module structure **Impact**: Will fix 4 tests ### Priority 3: Fix Extended Command Executor Tests (LOW IMPACT) **Problem**: Tests expect certain behavior that doesn't match implementation **Solution**: Align tests with actual implementation **Impact**: Will fix 4 tests --- ## 🎯 Path to 90% Coverage ### Step 1: Refactor 7 Tool Modules (2-3 hours) Move function definitions outside `register_` functions. **Expected Result**: 60+ tests passing, ~40% coverage ### Step 2: Add Direct Unit Tests (2-3 hours) Create tests that directly call the refactored functions. **Expected Result**: 100+ tests passing, ~60% coverage ### Step 3: Add Integration Tests (1-2 hours) Test tool interactions and complex scenarios. **Expected Result**: 120+ tests passing, ~80% coverage ### Step 4: Coverage Gap Analysis (1 hour) Use `pytest --cov-report=html` to find untested code paths. **Expected Result**: Identify remaining gaps ### Step 5: Fill Coverage Gaps (2-3 hours) Add targeted tests for uncovered lines. **Expected Result**: 130+ tests passing, **90%+ coverage** --- ## 🚀 Quick Win Strategy ### Fastest Path to 30% Coverage (TODAY) 1. **Keep Archive Tools** (26 tests, already 100%) 2. **Fix 3 Easy Tool Modules**: - `help_tools.py` (5 tests) - `system_tools.py` (6 tests) - `network_tools.py` (4 tests) **Result**: 41 tests passing, ~25-30% coverage ### Path to 60% Coverage (THIS WEEK) 1. Fix all 7 tool modules 2. Add missing unit tests 3. Fix integration tests **Result**: 80+ tests passing, 60% coverage ### Path to 90% Coverage (NEXT WEEK) 1. Complete refactoring 2. Add all integration tests 3. Fill coverage gaps 4. Add performance tests **Result**: 130+ tests passing, 90%+ coverage --- ## 💡 Architectural Insights ### Current Pattern (Problematic) ```python def register_tools(mcp): @mcp.tool() def my_tool(): pass ``` **Issues**: - Functions not directly importable - Can't unit test without MCP instance - Tight coupling to MCP framework ### Better Pattern (Recommended) ```python def my_tool(): """Tool implementation.""" pass def register_tools(mcp): mcp.tool(my_tool) ``` **Benefits**: - Functions are importable - Can unit test directly - Loose coupling - Better for documentation --- ## 📈 Progress Tracking ### Week 0 (Current) - [x] 139 tests created - [x] 63 tests passing (45%) - [x] Archive tools fully working - [x] Documentation fixed - [ ] 30% coverage target ### Week 1 Target - [ ] All tool modules refactored - [ ] 80+ tests passing (57%) - [ ] 60% coverage achieved - [ ] CI/CD pipeline active ### Week 2 Target - [ ] 120+ tests passing (86%) - [ ] 90% coverage achieved - [ ] Performance benchmarks done - [ ] PyPI published --- ## 🎓 Lessons Learned 1. **Test Organization**: Separate unit tests from integration tests clearly 2. **Import Patterns**: Direct imports are easier to test than nested functions 3. **Coverage vs Tests**: Having tests doesn't guarantee coverage - code must execute! 4. **Refactoring Value**: Well-structured code is easier to test 5. **Incremental Progress**: 63 passing tests is better than 0! --- ## 🔥 Immediate Next Actions 1. **Refactor `help_tools.py`** (quickest win) 2. **Refactor `system_tools.py`** (most used) 3. **Refactor `network_tools.py`** (small surface area) 4. **Run tests again** 5. **Celebrate reaching 50% pass rate!** --- **Status**: Foundation built, refactoring phase ready to begin! **Next Milestone**: 50% tests passing (70 tests) **Final Goal**: 90% coverage (130+ tests passing)