03-Design-Goals.md•9.63 kB
# 3. Design Goals
**Purpose:** Define the core principles and philosophy that guide mcp-ssh-orchestrator's design decisions, ensuring security, usability, and maintainability.
## Core Philosophy
mcp-ssh-orchestrator is built on the principle that **AI agents should have safe, controlled access to infrastructure** without compromising security or operational integrity. Every design decision prioritizes security while maintaining usability for legitimate operations.
## Primary Design Goals
### 1. Security First
**Principle:** Security is not an afterthought—it's the foundation of every feature.
**Implementation:**
- **Deny-by-default** policy model
- **Defense-in-depth** security architecture
- **Containerized execution** with resource limits
- **Comprehensive audit logging** for all operations
- **Network segmentation** with IP allowlists
**Example:**
```yaml
# Default policy: deny everything
rules: [] # No rules = deny all
# Explicit allow rules only
rules:
- action: "allow"
aliases: ["prod-*"]
commands: ["uptime*", "df -h*"]
```
### 2. Minimal Attack Surface
**Principle:** Reduce the potential for security vulnerabilities by minimizing exposed functionality.
**Implementation:**
- **Single-purpose design** (SSH command execution only)
- **Minimal dependencies** (Python standard library + SSH)
- **No persistent state** (stateless operation)
- **Read-only configuration** (no runtime modifications)
- **Non-root execution** (least privilege)
**Example:**
```dockerfile
# Minimal base image
FROM python:3.13-slim
# Non-root user
RUN useradd -u 10001 -m appuser
USER appuser
# Read-only filesystem
VOLUME ["/app/config:ro", "/app/keys:ro"]
```
### 3. Policy-Driven Control
**Principle:** All access decisions are governed by explicit, auditable policies.
**Implementation:**
- **YAML-based policy configuration**
- **Glob pattern matching** for flexible rules
- **Per-host and per-tag overrides**
- **Policy validation** before execution
- **Dry-run capability** (`ssh_plan`)
**Example:**
```yaml
# Environment-specific policies
rules:
- action: "allow"
tags: ["production"]
commands: ["uptime*", "df -h*"]
- action: "allow"
tags: ["development"]
commands: ["systemctl restart *", "docker ps*"]
```
### 4. Observability & Auditability
**Principle:** Every operation must be observable, auditable, and traceable.
**Implementation:**
- **JSON audit logs** to stderr
- **Structured logging** with timestamps
- **Command hashing** for integrity
- **Exit codes and durations** for monitoring
- **Target IP tracking** for network analysis
**Example:**
```json
{
"type": "audit",
"ts": 1729512345.67,
"alias": "prod-web-1",
"hash": "a1b2c3d4e5f6",
"exit_code": 0,
"duration_ms": 123,
"target_ip": "10.0.0.11"
}
```
### 5. Container-Native Design
**Principle:** Designed from the ground up for containerized deployment.
**Implementation:**
- **Docker-first** deployment model
- **Health checks** for monitoring
- **Resource limits** (CPU, memory)
- **Non-root execution** for security
- **Secrets management** via Docker secrets
**Example:**
```yaml
# Docker Compose integration
services:
mcp-ssh:
image: ghcr.io/samerfarida/mcp-ssh-orchestrator:0.1.0
volumes:
- ./config:/app/config:ro
- ./keys:/app/keys:ro
healthcheck:
test: ["CMD", "python", "-c", "import mcp_ssh"]
interval: 30s
timeout: 5s
retries: 3
```
## Secondary Design Goals
### 6. Developer Experience
**Principle:** Make secure operations easy and intuitive.
**Implementation:**
- **Clear error messages** with actionable guidance
- **Comprehensive documentation** with examples
- **Easy configuration** with sensible defaults
- **Quick start guides** for common scenarios
- **Troubleshooting guides** for common issues
### 7. Operational Simplicity
**Principle:** Reduce operational complexity while maintaining security.
**Implementation:**
- **Single binary** deployment (Docker image)
- **Configuration-driven** behavior
- **No external dependencies** (databases, queues)
- **Graceful error handling** with proper exit codes
- **Hot reload** of configuration (`ssh_reload_config`)
### 8. Security & Audit Ready
**Principle:** Security features that can support compliance and audit requirements.
**Implementation:**
- **OWASP LLM07** mitigation (Insecure Plugin Design)
- **MITRE ATT&CK** aligned logging and monitoring
- **Complete audit trails** for all operations
- **Immutable logs** (append-only)
- **Policy-based access control** for security
- **Dangerous command blocking** for safety
**Note:** Audit logs can be integrated with your existing security tooling and SIEM systems for compliance monitoring.
## Design Constraints
### Security Constraints
1. **No Persistent State**
- No databases or file storage
- Configuration loaded at startup
- Stateless operation for security
2. **No Network Egress**
- No outbound connections (except SSH)
- No external API calls
- No telemetry or analytics
3. **No Code Execution**
- No dynamic code loading
- No plugin system
- No script execution
### Operational Constraints
1. **Single Purpose**
- SSH command execution only
- No file transfer (scp/sftp)
- No interactive sessions
2. **Resource Limits**
- CPU and memory caps
- Output size limits
- Execution timeouts
3. **Network Restrictions**
- IP allowlists only
- No DNS resolution bypass
- No proxy support
## Design Trade-offs
### Security vs. Usability
**Trade-off:** Strict security policies may limit legitimate operations.
**Resolution:**
- Provide comprehensive policy examples
- Enable dry-run testing (`ssh_plan`)
- Support per-environment policies
- Clear documentation of restrictions
### Performance vs. Security
**Trade-off:** Security checks add latency to command execution.
**Resolution:**
- Policy evaluation is fast (in-memory)
- SSH connection reuse where possible
- Minimal overhead logging
- Configurable timeouts
### Flexibility vs. Simplicity
**Trade-off:** More configuration options increase complexity.
**Resolution:**
- Sensible defaults for common scenarios
- Progressive disclosure of advanced features
- Clear examples for different use cases
- Validation of configuration syntax
## Implementation Principles
### 1. Fail Secure
**Principle:** When in doubt, deny access.
**Implementation:**
- Default policy is deny-all
- Invalid configurations fail closed
- Network errors prevent execution
- Timeouts terminate operations
### 2. Explicit Configuration
**Principle:** Nothing happens by accident.
**Implementation:**
- No implicit permissions
- Explicit allow rules required
- Clear policy documentation
- Validation of all inputs
### 3. Minimal Dependencies
**Principle:** Fewer dependencies = fewer vulnerabilities.
**Implementation:**
- Python standard library only
- SSH via paramiko (minimal)
- No external HTTP libraries
- No database dependencies
### 4. Immutable Configuration
**Principle:** Configuration changes require restart or explicit reload.
**Implementation:**
- No runtime configuration changes
- `ssh_reload_config` for updates
- Validation before reload
- Clear error messages for invalid configs
## Quality Attributes
### Security Attributes
- **Confidentiality:** Encrypted SSH transport, no credential storage
- **Integrity:** Command hashing and audit trails
- **Availability:** Health checks, graceful degradation, resource limits
### Operational Attributes
- **Reliability:** Graceful error handling, proper exit codes, timeout management
- **Maintainability:** Clear code structure, comprehensive tests, documentation
- **Scalability:** Stateless design, resource limits, efficient resource usage
### Usability Attributes
- **Learnability:** Clear documentation, examples, quick start guides
- **Efficiency:** Fast policy evaluation, connection reuse, minimal overhead
- **Satisfaction:** Clear error messages, helpful troubleshooting, responsive design
## Evolution Strategy
### Backward Compatibility
**Principle:** Maintain compatibility across minor versions.
**Implementation:**
- Semantic versioning (SemVer)
- Deprecation warnings for old features
- Migration guides for breaking changes
- Configuration validation with helpful errors
### Forward Compatibility
**Principle:** Design for future MCP protocol evolution.
**Implementation:**
- MCP specification compliance
- Extensible policy engine
- Plugin-ready architecture (future)
- API versioning support
## Success Metrics
### Security Objectives
- **Policy enforcement** for all operations
- **Audit coverage** for all command executions
- **Zero privileged escalation** in design
- **Network controls** enforced via IP allowlists
### Performance Goals
- **Fast policy evaluation** (< 10ms typical)
- **Efficient SSH connections** with minimal overhead
- **Resource-efficient** single container deployment
- **Responsive execution** with configurable timeouts
### Project Metrics
- **Documentation completeness** with examples for all features
- **Code quality** through testing and linting
- **Community engagement** through clear issue management
- **Feature stability** with backward compatibility
## Next Steps
- **[Architecture](04-Architecture)** - How these goals are implemented in the system design
- **[Security Model](05-Security-Model)** - Defense-in-depth security architecture
- **[Configuration](06-Configuration)** - Policy-driven configuration system
- **[Contributing](13-Contributing)** - How to contribute while maintaining these principles