EuConquisto Composer MCP

# Progress Report - June 27, 2025 ## =� Session Overview **Objective**: Comprehensive evaluation of EuConquisto Composer MCP server approach and identification of implementation gaps **Duration**: Full analysis session **Participants**: Claude Code (implementation analysis) **Next**: Strategic planning with Claude Desktop ## = Analysis Completed ### 1. Project Structure & Architecture Evaluation  **Comprehensive project analysis completed** - Analyzed 646 lines of browser automation code - Reviewed MCP protocol implementation - Assessed TypeScript architecture and build system - Evaluated testing infrastructure and documentation **Key Findings**: - Well-organized project structure with clear separation of concerns - Comprehensive interface definitions (461 lines of auth interfaces) - Solid MCP SDK integration using official Anthropic SDK - Complete educational workflow modeling ### 2. MCP Server Implementation Review  **Detailed MCP compliance analysis** - Reviewed 7 implemented tools - Assessed JSON-RPC 2.0 compliance - Analyzed error handling and response patterns - Evaluated integration with Claude Desktop **Status**: 43% functionality (3/7 tools working) -  Working: `test-connection`, `get-widget-info`, `get-composer-url` - L Failing: Browser automation tools due to DOM selector issues ### 3. Browser Automation Strategy Analysis  **Playwright vs API integration comparison completed** **Current Approach**: Playwright browser automation - **Pros**: Complete UI access, handles complex workflows, authentication working - **Cons**: 57% failure rate, performance overhead, maintenance burden **API Alternative**: Limited availability - Research found minimal functional API endpoints - Existing `ComposerAPIBridge` class incomplete - JWT token suggests API capability but endpoints not functional **Recommendation**: Continue with Playwright, fix DOM selectors ### 4. Authentication Security Assessment  **Critical security analysis completed** **Current State**: Development/Insecure - Hardcoded JWT tokens in 4 source files - No authentication validation middleware - Missing session management - Comprehensive interfaces defined but 0% implemented **Risk Level**: =� **HIGH** - Not production ready ### 5. Scope Prioritization for Validation  **Validation strategy defined** **Target**: 75% tool functionality for concept validation **Critical Path**: 1. Fix `create-new-composition` (DOM selectors) 2. Fix `save-composition` (DOM selectors) 3. End-to-end workflow testing **Validation Scope**: 2-3 content components (Text, Header, Image widgets) ## <� Key Decisions Made ### 1. Browser Automation Strategy **Decision**: Continue with Playwright approach **Rationale**: Only viable option currently, solid foundation exists **Next**: Request stable CSS selectors from EuConquisto team ### 2. Scope Prioritization **Decision**: Focus on validation-first approach **Target**: 75% tool functionality within 2 weeks **Priority**: DOM selector fixes for core workflow tools ### 3. Authentication Model **Immediate**: Environment-based development auth (remove hardcoded secrets) **Recommended**: Service account model for production **Future**: Full multi-user OAuth 2.1 implementation ## =� Current Project Status ### Working Components (43%) - MCP protocol foundation  - JWT authentication (basic)  - Claude Desktop integration  - 3/7 tools functional  ### Blocking Issues - DOM selector failures preventing composition creation L - Security vulnerabilities (hardcoded secrets) L - Missing authentication validation L - Browser automation reliability issues L ### Implementation Quality - TypeScript compilation:  Zero errors - Architecture design:  Excellent - Documentation:  Comprehensive - Testing infrastructure: � Incomplete ## =� Next Steps Identified ### Immediate Actions (Claude Code) 1. **DOM Selector Debugging**: Fix `create-new-composition` and `save-composition` tools 2. **Authentication Security**: Move JWT tokens to environment variables 3. **Validation Testing**: End-to-end workflow verification ### Strategic Planning (Claude Desktop) 1. **Resource Constraints Planning**: Server requirements and deployment strategy 2. **User Volume Assessment**: Scaling considerations and performance requirements 3. **Testing Strategy**: Comprehensive test planning approach 4. **Deployment Model**: Production architecture decisions ## =� Recommendations Summary ### Technical Approach:  SOUND - MCP server architecture well-designed - Browser automation approach viable with fixes - Strong TypeScript foundation ### Implementation Status: � DEVELOPMENT REQUIRED - Core functionality blocked by DOM selectors - Security vulnerabilities need immediate attention - Testing infrastructure needs completion ### Project Viability:  HIGH - Concept validation achievable within 2 weeks - Clear path to production readiness - Strong architectural foundation for scaling ## <� Success Criteria for Next Phase ### Validation Ready (2 weeks) - [ ] 5/7 tools working (75% functionality) - [ ] End-to-end composition creation workflow - [ ] Environment-based authentication - [ ] Shareable composition URL generation ### Production Ready (4-6 weeks) - [ ] 7/7 tools working (100% functionality) - [ ] Service account authentication model - [ ] Comprehensive testing suite - [ ] Production deployment configuration --- **Assessment**: Project has excellent potential with focused development effort required for DOM automation fixes and security hardening. **Recommendation**: Continue with validation-first approach, address security issues immediately, plan strategic scaling with Claude Desktop.## Session Progress - 2025-06-27