# Integrations, Agents & Automation Audit
**Audit Date:** January 30, 2026
**Auditor:** Integrations, Agents & Automation Specialist
**Repository:** nirholas/universal-crypto-mcp
**Scope:** packages/integrations, packages/agents, packages/automation, packages/novel, packages/generators, vendor/, xeepy/
---
## Section 1: Executive Summary
### Overview of Integration Capabilities
The Universal Crypto MCP repository demonstrates an **extensive integration architecture** encompassing 60+ third-party services, AI agents, automation workflows, and novel experimental features. The integrations span multiple categories:
- **Exchange APIs:** 12 cryptocurrency exchanges (Binance, Coinbase, Kraken, OKX, Bybit, KuCoin, Gemini, Bitfinex, HTX, Gate.io, MEXC, Bitget)
- **Data Providers:** 5 analytics providers (CoinGecko, DeFiLlama, CryptoCompare, Messari, Glassnode)
- **External MCP Servers:** 28+ community MCP server integrations for various blockchains
- **Agent Types:** 3 distinct agent frameworks (Agenti, UCAI, DeFi Agents)
- **Automation Tools:** Social media bots, dust sweeping, volume generation
### Key Findings and Concerns
| Category | Status | Concern Level |
|----------|--------|---------------|
| Integration Coverage | ā ļø Moderate | Many integrations are scaffolded but lack full implementation |
| Agent Safety | š“ High | Missing guardrails and human-in-the-loop mechanisms |
| Rate Limiting | š“ High | Minimal rate limiting implementation across integrations |
| Error Handling | ā ļø Moderate | Inconsistent error handling patterns |
| Secret Management | ā ļø Moderate | Environment variables used but no vault integration |
| Retry Logic | š“ High | Almost no retry logic found in API clients |
| Testing | š“ High | Limited integration test coverage |
### Integration Maturity Assessment
**Overall Maturity: Level 2/5 (Initial/Developing)**
The repository shows strong vision and architecture planning but lacks production-ready implementation in many areas. Most integrations follow consistent patterns but require significant hardening before deployment.
---
## Section 2: Integrations Package Analysis
### Supported Third-Party Services
The `/packages/integrations/` directory is organized into three main categories:
#### 1. API MCP Servers (`api-mcp-servers/`)
- **CoinGecko MCP Server:** Fully implemented with 7 tools (get_coin_price, get_coin_market_data, get_trending_coins, search_coins, get_global_market_data, get_coin_history, get_exchanges)
#### 2. External APIs (`external-apis/`)
| Provider | Type | Implementation Status |
|----------|------|----------------------|
| Gemini | Exchange | ā
Full |
| Bitfinex | Exchange | ā
Full |
| HTX | Exchange | ā
Full |
| Gate.io | Exchange | ā
Full |
| MEXC | Exchange | ā
Full |
| Bitget | Exchange | ā
Full with HMAC signing |
| CryptoCompare | Data | ā
Full with rate limit support |
| Messari | Data | ā
Full |
| Glassnode | Data | ā
Full |
#### 3. External MCP Servers (`external-mcp/`)
28 integrated MCP servers covering:
- **Block Explorers:** Etherscan, Polygonscan, BSCscan, Arbitrum, Optimism, Base
- **DEX Tools:** DeFiLlama MCP, DEX Aggregator MCP
- **Analytics:** Dune Analytics, Nansen, Arkham Intelligence
- **Multi-Chain:** Solana Agent Kit, Cosmos Hub, NEAR, Aptos, Sui, Polkadot, Cardano
### Integration Patterns Used
The codebase employs several integration patterns:
1. **Adapter Pattern** - Base adapter class with standardized interface:
```typescript
// packages/integrations/README.md shows adapter pattern
export class ProjectAdapter extends MCPServerAdapter {
protected getUpstreamTools() { ... }
protected async executeUpstreamTool(name: string, args: any) { ... }
}
```
2. **Direct API Clients** - HTTP clients for exchange APIs with HMAC signature authentication
3. **Git Subtree Integration** - Vendoring external repositories with preserved history
### Authentication Handling
Authentication is handled per-integration with varying approaches:
| Integration | Auth Method | Storage |
|------------|-------------|---------|
| CoinGecko | API Key Header | Environment variable (`COINGECKO_API_KEY`) |
| Bitget | HMAC-SHA256 | Credentials object (apiKey, apiSecret, passphrase) |
| Dune Analytics | API Key | Environment variable + constructor param |
| Etherscan | API Key | Constructor parameter |
**ā ļø CONCERN:** No centralized credential management or vault integration found.
### Rate Limiting Strategies
**Critical Finding:** Rate limiting is **largely absent** from the codebase.
- Only CryptoCompare integration has a `getRateLimits()` function
- No token bucket or sliding window implementations found
- README mentions rate limiting as a planned feature but not implemented
### Error Handling Consistency
Error handling patterns vary significantly:
- **CoinGecko MCP:** Uses try/catch with axios, returns structured error responses
- **Bitget API:** No error handling in HTTP request functions
- **External MCP servers:** Basic try/catch with console.error logging
### Retry Logic Patterns
**Critical Finding:** **No retry logic** found in any integration.
No evidence of:
- Exponential backoff
- Circuit breakers
- Retry policies for transient failures
### Webhook Handling
No webhook handling mechanisms found in the integrations package.
### Data Transformation/Normalization
Some type definitions exist for normalization:
- Shared types exported from `external-apis/index.ts`
- Standardized interfaces (Ticker, Orderbook, Balance, Order) across exchanges
### Integration Testing Approach
**Finding:** Test coverage appears limited.
- `/packages/generators/discovery/src/__tests__/` exists
- No test files found in `packages/integrations/`
---
## Section 3: Agents Package Deep Dive
### Agent Architecture Overview
The agents package contains four sub-packages with a layered architecture:
```
packages/agents/
āāā agenti/ # Core agent framework (base abstraction)
āāā ucai/ # Universal Crypto AI (multi-chain specialist)
āāā defi-agents/ # DeFi-specialized agents
āāā library/ # 505+ agent definitions (empty in scan)
```
### Agent Types Implemented
#### 1. Agenti (Base Agent Framework)
Located at `packages/agents/agenti/src/agent.ts`:
```typescript
export class Agent {
private config: AgentConfig;
constructor(config: AgentConfig) { ... }
getName(): string { ... }
getDescription(): string { ... }
getCoreVersion(): string { ... }
}
```
**Assessment:** Minimal implementation - serves as a base class but lacks action execution, decision-making, or tool calling.
#### 2. UCAI (Universal Crypto AI)
Located at `packages/agents/ucai/src/ucai.ts`:
```typescript
export class UCAIAgent {
private config: UCAIConfig;
getChains(): string[] { ... }
getCapabilities(): string[] { ... }
}
```
**Assessment:** Configuration container only - no execution logic implemented.
#### 3. DeFi Agents
Located at `packages/agents/defi-agents/src/index.ts`:
Provides factory functions:
- `createYieldAgent(name, chains)` - Yield optimization capabilities
- `createTradingAgent(name, chains)` - Swap/bridge capabilities
- `createPortfolioAgent(name, chains)` - Portfolio management capabilities
**Assessment:** Type-safe configuration but no actual trading/yield logic implemented.
### Decision-Making Logic
**Critical Finding:** No decision-making logic implemented in any agent class.
The agents are currently "configuration holders" without:
- Action selection algorithms
- Strategy evaluation
- Market condition analysis
- Risk assessment logic
### State Management
State management is minimal:
- Agents store configuration in private `config` fields
- No persistent state storage
- No state machine implementations
- No event sourcing patterns
### Memory/Context Handling
No memory or context handling found:
- No conversation history
- No long-term memory systems
- No vector storage integration
- No context window management
### Tool/Function Calling Patterns
From `packages/agents/agenti/README.md`:
```typescript
agent.addTools(defineTools({
greet: {
description: 'Greet a user',
parameters: { name: { type: 'string', required: true } },
handler: async ({ name }) => `Hello, ${name}!`,
},
}));
```
**Assessment:** Tool definition API exists but no tools are actually registered in the source code.
### LLM Integration
No direct LLM integration found in the agents package. The README mentions AI capabilities but no actual OpenAI/Anthropic/Ollama integration code exists in the agents source.
### Agent Communication Patterns
No inter-agent communication patterns implemented:
- No pub/sub messaging
- No shared event bus
- No agent orchestration
### Autonomy Levels and Guardrails
**š“ CRITICAL CONCERN:** No guardrails implemented.
Missing safeguards:
- No maximum transaction size limits
- No spending caps
- No portfolio allocation constraints
- No approval workflows for large transactions
- No kill switches
### Human-in-the-Loop Mechanisms
**š“ CRITICAL CONCERN:** No human-in-the-loop mechanisms found.
The codebase lacks:
- Approval queues for significant actions
- Confirmation prompts before execution
- Manual override capabilities
- Audit logging for human review
---
## Section 4: Automation Package Review
### Package Structure
```
packages/automation/
āāā mcp-monitor/ # Empty - monitoring tools
āāā social/ # Twitter/X automation (XActions)
āāā social-python/ # Python-based social tools
āāā sweep/ # Dust sweeper (multi-chain)
āāā volume/ # Boosty volume generation platform
```
### Workflow Definitions
#### Sweep Workflow
The dust sweeper in `packages/automation/sweep/` provides:
- Multi-chain dust scanning (8 chains)
- ERC-4337 gasless transactions
- DeFi yield routing (Aave, Yearn, Beefy, Lido, Jito)
- Cross-chain consolidation
Source structure:
```
sweep/src/
āāā api/ # API endpoints
āāā config/ # Configuration
āāā db/ # Database schemas
āāā queue/ # Job queuing
āāā services/ # Core services
āāā workers.ts # Background workers
```
#### Volume Generation Workflow
The Boosty platform in `packages/automation/volume/` is a comprehensive DeFi automation system:
```
volume/packages/
āāā combined/ # Unified interface
āāā core-blockchain/ # Chain interactions
āāā mcp-server/ # MCP protocol server
āāā orchestrator/ # Workflow coordination
āāā trading-engine/ # Trade execution
āāā wallet-manager/ # HD wallet management
āāā 7 more packages...
```
### Trigger Mechanisms
Found trigger patterns:
- **Scheduled jobs:** Volume campaigns with time-based triggers
- **Event-driven:** WebSocket subscriptions for price alerts
- **Manual:** CLI commands and API endpoints
### Scheduling Capabilities
From the volume package, scheduling includes:
- Campaign scheduling with start/end times
- Transaction spacing (gaussian distribution for "organic" patterns)
- Daily volume targets with time distribution
### Conditional Logic Handling
Limited conditional logic found:
- Basic if/else for trade decisions
- Campaign state machine (idle, running, paused, stopped, error)
### Action Execution Patterns
Execution follows a pipeline:
1. Intent parsing (natural language)
2. Parameter validation
3. Transaction building
4. Simulation (optional)
5. Execution with confirmation
### Error Recovery in Workflows
Database schema shows retry support:
```sql
status VARCHAR(20) CHECK (status IN ('pending', 'processing', 'completed', 'failed', 'retry'))
retry_count INTEGER DEFAULT 0
```
However, actual retry logic implementation is minimal.
### Workflow Persistence
PostgreSQL-based persistence:
- Campaign state tracking
- Transaction history
- Wallet management data
### Monitoring and Observability
Limited monitoring:
- Console.error for logging
- Database status fields
- No Prometheus/Grafana integration in automation package
### Scalability Considerations
Architecture supports scaling:
- Worker-based job processing
- Redis for job queuing
- Database for state persistence
- But no horizontal scaling documentation
---
## Section 5: MCP Server Integration Analysis
### MCP Protocol Compliance
The project follows the Model Context Protocol specification:
From `server.json`:
```json
{
"$schema": "https://static.modelcontextprotocol.io/schemas/2025-12-11/server.schema.json",
"name": "io.github.nirholas/universal-crypto-mcp",
"version": "0.1.0"
}
```
### Tool Definitions and Schemas
CoinGecko MCP server example of proper tool definition:
```typescript
{
name: 'get_coin_price',
description: 'Get current price of cryptocurrency in multiple currencies',
inputSchema: {
type: 'object',
properties: {
coin_id: { type: 'string', description: 'CoinGecko coin ID' },
vs_currencies: { type: 'string', default: 'usd' }
},
required: ['coin_id']
}
}
```
### Resource Handling
Resources are properly defined in the agenti framework:
```typescript
agent.addResources({
'config://settings': {
name: 'Agent Settings',
mimeType: 'application/json',
read: async () => JSON.stringify({ mode: 'production' })
}
});
```
### Prompt Templates
Prompt templates supported:
```typescript
agent.addPrompts({
'analyze-code': {
name: 'Code Analysis',
arguments: [{ name: 'code', required: true }],
template: ({ code }) => `Analyze this code: ${code}`
}
});
```
### Server Configuration
Server configuration properly documented:
- Environment variables for secrets
- Transport type: stdio (primary)
- Package registry: npm with @nirholas scope
### Transport Mechanisms
Supported transports:
- **stdio** - Standard input/output (primary)
- **HTTP** - For web-based integrations
- **WebSocket** - For real-time streaming (in xeepy)
### Error Responses
Standard MCP error response pattern:
```typescript
} catch (error) {
const errorMessage = error instanceof Error ? error.message : 'Unknown error';
return {
content: [{ type: 'text', text: JSON.stringify({ error: errorMessage }) }],
isError: true
};
}
```
### Capability Negotiation
Capabilities declared in server setup:
```typescript
this.server = new Server({ name: 'server-name', version: '1.0.0' }, {
capabilities: { tools: {} }
});
```
---
## Section 6: Generators Package Review
### Generator Types Available
```
packages/generators/
āāā abi-to-mcp/ # Smart contract ABI ā MCP tools
āāā discovery/ # MCP server discovery & analysis
āāā doc-extractor/ # Documentation extraction
āāā intel/ # Intelligence gathering
āāā playground/ # Interactive testing
āāā registry/ # Tool registry (Lyra)
āāā repo-to-mcp/ # GitHub repo ā MCP server
āāā web3-playground/ # Web3 development sandbox
```
### Template Systems Used
The repo-to-mcp generator uses:
- Template-based code generation
- Configuration-driven output
- Multiple output formats (TypeScript, Python)
### Discovery Package Details
The discovery system (`packages/generators/discovery/`) provides:
```typescript
export class ToolDiscovery {
private github: GitHubSource;
private npm: NpmSource;
private ai: AIAnalyzer;
async discover(options: DiscoveryOptions): Promise<DiscoveryResult[]> { ... }
async analyzeGitHubRepo(owner: string, repo: string): Promise<DiscoveryResult> { ... }
}
```
Features:
- GitHub API integration for MCP server discovery
- NPM registry scanning
- AI-powered analysis of repository suitability
- Crypto/DeFi keyword filtering
### Output Validation
Limited validation found:
- TypeScript type checking
- JSON schema validation for outputs
- No runtime validation of generated code
### Configuration Options
Discovery options:
```typescript
interface DiscoveryOptions {
sources?: DiscoverySource[];
limit?: number;
dryRun?: boolean;
outputDir?: string;
maxAgeMonths?: number;
}
```
### Extensibility Patterns
Generators follow plugin architecture:
- Source adapters (GitHub, NPM)
- AI analyzers for decision making
- Template customization
### Generated Code Quality
Generated code follows consistent patterns but:
- No automatic linting of output
- No test generation
- No documentation generation
---
## Section 7: Novel Features Assessment
### Experimental Features Inventory
| Feature | Location | Status | Description |
|---------|----------|--------|-------------|
| Temporal Oracles | `novel/temporal-oracles/` | š Scaffolded | Time-locked data revelation |
| Reputation Graphs | `novel/reputation-graphs/` | šØ Partial | Multi-dimensional reputation scoring |
| Intent Solver | `novel/intent-solver/` | šØ Partial | Constraint-based transaction routing |
| Privacy Pools | `novel/privacy-pools/` | šØ Partial | Compliant privacy with ZK proofs |
| Quantum Resistant | `novel/quantum-resistant/` | š Scaffolded | Post-quantum cryptography |
| Memecoin Trader | `novel/memecoin-trader/` | ā
Implemented | Solana memecoin trading bot |
### Stability Assessment
| Feature | Stability | Notes |
|---------|-----------|-------|
| Intent Solver | Alpha | Core types defined, routing not implemented |
| Privacy Pools | Alpha | Data structures defined, ZK proofs mocked |
| Reputation Graphs | Alpha | Basic graph operations, no persistence |
| Quantum Resistant | Proof of Concept | No real PQ algorithms |
| Memecoin Trader | Beta | Most complete, has risk management |
### Feature Flags Usage
**Finding:** No feature flag system implemented.
No evidence of:
- LaunchDarkly integration
- Environment-based feature toggles
- Gradual rollout mechanisms
### Migration Paths
No migration tooling or versioning strategy for novel features.
### Documentation Quality
README files exist for each novel feature with:
- Concept explanations
- Code examples
- Architecture descriptions
However, missing:
- API documentation
- Security considerations
- Performance benchmarks
### Risk Assessment
| Feature | Risk Level | Reason |
|---------|------------|--------|
| Memecoin Trader | š“ High | Real money trading with limited guardrails |
| Privacy Pools | ā ļø Medium | Regulatory implications, mocked cryptography |
| Intent Solver | ā ļø Medium | Could route transactions incorrectly |
| Quantum Resistant | š¢ Low | Not used in production |
---
## Section 8: Vendor Dependencies Audit
### Vendored Package Inventory
```
vendor/
āāā INTEGRATION-GUIDE.md # Integration documentation
āāā README.md # Overview
āāā ethers-integration/ # ethers.js v6
āāā ATTRIBUTION.md
āāā LICENSE (MIT)
āāā README.md
```
### Version Tracking
Current vendored packages:
| Package | Version | Source | Last Updated |
|---------|---------|--------|--------------|
| ethers.js | v6.x | npm dependency | Referenced |
**Note:** ethers.js is actually an npm dependency, not vendored source code. The vendor directory contains documentation only.
### Security Vulnerabilities
**Finding:** No vulnerability scanning found for vendored code.
Missing:
- Snyk integration
- npm audit configuration
- Dependabot for vendor directory
### License Compliance
The vendor guide correctly emphasizes license compliance:
```markdown
## Step 1: Verify License Compatibility
ā
MIT
ā
BSD
ā
Apache 2.0
ā GPL (not compatible)
```
All checked integrations use compatible licenses (MIT/Apache 2.0).
### Update Frequency
No automated update mechanism for vendored dependencies:
- Manual subtree updates required
- No changelog tracking
- No version pinning enforcement
### Patch Management
No patch management process documented:
- No security advisory monitoring
- No hotfix procedures
- No rollback capabilities
---
## Section 9: API Design Consistency
### Interface Consistency Across Integrations
Exchange APIs follow consistent patterns:
```typescript
// All exchanges export similar interfaces
export interface [Exchange]Credentials {
apiKey: string;
apiSecret: string;
// Optional: passphrase
}
export interface [Exchange]Ticker {
symbol: string;
price: string;
volume: string;
// ...
}
```
### Naming Conventions
Generally consistent:
- **Classes:** PascalCase (e.g., `CoinGeckoMCPServer`, `DeFiAgent`)
- **Functions:** camelCase (e.g., `createAgent`, `getDecayedScore`)
- **Types:** PascalCase with descriptive names
- **Constants:** UPPER_SNAKE_CASE (e.g., `COINGECKO_API`, `CRYPTO_KEYWORDS`)
**Inconsistencies found:**
- Some files use `interface` vs `type` interchangeably
- Mixed use of `.js` and `.ts` extensions in imports
### Error Format Standardization
**Inconsistent error handling:**
Pattern 1 (MCP servers):
```typescript
return { content: [{ type: 'text', text: JSON.stringify({ error: msg }) }], isError: true };
```
Pattern 2 (API clients):
```typescript
throw new Error(`Error message`);
```
Pattern 3 (Some integrations):
```typescript
console.error('Error:', error);
```
**Recommendation:** Standardize on a single error response format.
### Response Structure Patterns
API responses lack standardization:
- Some return raw data
- Some return wrapped objects
- No consistent envelope pattern
### Pagination Handling
**Finding:** No pagination handling found in most integrations.
CryptoCompare is an exception with limit/offset support.
### Versioning Strategy
MCP server versioning follows semantic versioning:
```json
{ "version": "0.1.0" }
```
No API versioning found for individual integrations.
---
## Section 10: Observability & Monitoring
### Logging Implementations
Multiple logging patterns found:
1. **Console-based:** Most packages use `console.log/error`
2. **Logger class:** Some packages have Logger utilities:
```typescript
static debug(...args: any[]) {
if (process.env.DEBUG) console.error("[DEBUG]", ...args)
}
```
3. **Loguru (Python):** Xeepy uses structured logging:
```python
from loguru import logger
```
### Metrics Collection
**Finding:** No standardized metrics collection.
- Prometheus configuration file exists in `xeepy/prometheus.yml`
- No metrics instrumentation in TypeScript packages
- No custom metrics defined
### Tracing Support
**Finding:** No distributed tracing implemented.
Missing:
- OpenTelemetry integration
- Trace context propagation
- Span collection
### Health Checks
Limited health check implementations:
Xeepy API:
```markdown
- **Health Check**: http://localhost:8000/health
```
No health checks in MCP servers or other packages.
### Alerting Integration
**Finding:** No alerting configuration found.
No integration with:
- PagerDuty
- Opsgenie
- Email alerts
- Slack notifications
### Dashboard Availability
Xeepy mentions dashboards:
```markdown
- **Comprehensive Dashboard** - Real-time analytics and metrics
```
No Grafana dashboards or visualization configurations found in the repository.
---
## Section 11: Issues & Recommendations Table
| Priority | Issue | Location | Description | Recommended Fix |
|----------|-------|----------|-------------|-----------------|
| š“ Critical | No rate limiting | `packages/integrations/**` | API clients can overwhelm external services | Implement token bucket rate limiter per API |
| š“ Critical | No retry logic | `packages/integrations/**` | Transient failures cause complete failure | Add exponential backoff with jitter |
| š“ Critical | No agent guardrails | `packages/agents/**` | Autonomous agents lack safety limits | Add spending limits, approval queues, kill switches |
| š“ Critical | No human-in-the-loop | `packages/agents/**`, `packages/automation/**` | High-value actions execute without approval | Implement confirmation workflows |
| š“ Critical | Secrets in env vars | All packages | No vault integration, secrets in environment | Integrate HashiCorp Vault or AWS Secrets Manager |
| ā ļø High | Inconsistent error handling | All packages | Multiple error patterns, hard to debug | Create shared error handling library |
| ā ļø High | No timeout handling | `packages/integrations/**` | HTTP requests can hang indefinitely | Add configurable timeouts (default 30s) |
| ā ļø High | Limited test coverage | All packages | Most packages lack integration tests | Add minimum 70% coverage requirement |
| ā ļø High | No observability | `packages/**` | No metrics, tracing, or structured logging | Implement OpenTelemetry |
| ā ļø Medium | Empty agent implementations | `packages/agents/**` | Agent classes are configuration-only | Implement actual decision/execution logic |
| ā ļø Medium | No pagination | `packages/integrations/**` | Large result sets can't be retrieved | Implement cursor-based pagination |
| ā ļø Medium | Hardcoded API endpoints | Various | Some endpoints are hardcoded strings | Move to configuration |
| ā ļø Medium | No feature flags | `packages/novel/**` | Experimental features always enabled | Implement feature flag system |
| ā ļø Medium | No webhook handling | `packages/integrations/**` | Can't receive external events | Add webhook endpoints and handlers |
| š” Low | Inconsistent naming | All packages | Some files use different conventions | Establish and enforce style guide |
| š” Low | No API versioning | `packages/integrations/**` | Breaking changes can't be managed | Add versioning headers/paths |
| š” Low | Limited documentation | Various | Some packages lack API docs | Generate TypeDoc documentation |
| š” Low | No changelog automation | All packages | Manual changelog maintenance | Implement conventional commits + auto-changelog |
---
## Section 12: Action Items Summary
### Critical Improvements Needed
1. **Implement Rate Limiting Framework**
- Create shared rate limiter utility in `packages/shared/`
- Apply to all external API integrations
- Configure per-API limits based on provider documentation
2. **Add Retry Logic with Circuit Breakers**
- Implement exponential backoff library
- Add circuit breaker pattern for failing services
- Create retry policies per integration
3. **Agent Safety Mechanisms**
- Add transaction size limits
- Implement approval workflows for large transactions
- Create kill switch functionality
- Add portfolio allocation constraints
4. **Secrets Management**
- Remove secrets from environment variables for production
- Integrate with secrets management solution
- Implement secret rotation
### Integration Gaps to Address
1. **Missing Rate Limit Implementations**
- Priority: Bitget, Gate.io, MEXC (high-frequency trading)
2. **Timeout Handling**
- Add 30-second default timeout to all HTTP clients
- Make timeout configurable per request
3. **Webhook Support**
- Add webhook receivers for exchange notifications
- Implement signature validation
- Add retry queue for failed deliveries
4. **Pagination Support**
- Add cursor-based pagination to exchange APIs
- Implement automatic page fetching for large datasets
### Agent Safety Improvements
1. **Guardrails Implementation**
```typescript
interface AgentGuardrails {
maxTransactionValue: bigint;
dailySpendingLimit: bigint;
allowedChains: string[];
allowedProtocols: string[];
requireApprovalAbove: bigint;
}
```
2. **Human-in-the-Loop**
- Approval queue for transactions > $1000
- Manual confirmation for new addresses
- Audit log for all actions
3. **Emergency Stop**
- Global kill switch
- Per-agent pause capability
- Automatic stop on loss thresholds
### Documentation Needs
1. **API Documentation**
- Generate TypeDoc for all packages
- Add JSDoc comments to all public functions
- Create integration guides
2. **Security Documentation**
- Document authentication flows
- Create threat model
- Add security best practices guide
3. **Runbook Creation**
- Incident response procedures
- Debugging guides
- Rollback procedures
---
## Appendix A: Package Dependency Map
```
packages/integrations/
āāā @modelcontextprotocol/sdk
āāā axios
āāā crypto (Node.js built-in)
packages/agents/
āāā @universal-crypto-mcp/core
āāā @modelcontextprotocol/sdk
packages/automation/
āāā drizzle-orm (sweep)
āāā hono (sweep)
āāā @solana/web3.js (volume)
āāā Various DEX SDKs
packages/novel/
āāā viem
āāā @universal-crypto-mcp/core
packages/generators/
āāā @anthropic-ai/sdk
āāā openai
āāā octokit
```
## Appendix B: External API Endpoints
| Integration | Base URL | Version |
|------------|----------|---------|
| CoinGecko | https://api.coingecko.com/api/v3 | v3 |
| Bitget | https://api.bitget.com | v2 |
| CryptoCompare | https://min-api.cryptocompare.com | v1 |
| Dune | https://api.dune.com | v1 |
| Etherscan | https://api.etherscan.io | v2 |
## Appendix C: Environment Variables Reference
| Variable | Package | Required | Secret |
|----------|---------|----------|--------|
| COINGECKO_API_KEY | integrations/api-mcp-servers | No | Yes |
| DUNE_API_KEY | integrations/external-mcp | Yes | Yes |
| PRIVATE_KEY | Various | Context | Yes |
| ALCHEMY_API_KEY | core | No | Yes |
| TWITTER_API_KEY | automation/social | Yes | Yes |
| OPENAI_API_KEY | generators | No | Yes |
| ANTHROPIC_API_KEY | generators | No | Yes |
---
**End of Audit Report**
*This audit was conducted by Agent 4 (Integrations, Agents & Automation Specialist) on January 30, 2026. The findings represent a point-in-time assessment and should be re-evaluated as the codebase evolves.*
